期刊文献+

微创与传统全膝关节置换术早期疗效比较 被引量:2

EARLY POSTOPERATIVE CLINICAL EFFECT OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE VERSUS CONVENTIONAL TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较微创与传统全膝关节置换术(TKA)的早期疗效。方法2018年9—12月,将需要行单侧TKA的90例膝骨关节炎(KOA)病人随机分为传统TKA组和微创TKA(MIS-TKA)组,各45例。比较两组病人手术相关指标,术后关节功能康复情况,不同时间点的静息和活动疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分,炎症指标红细胞沉降率(ESR)、C-反应蛋白(CRP)水平,双侧膝关节皮温差及术后并发症发生情况。结果MIS-TKA组病人的切口长度小于传统TKA组,手术时间长于传统TKA组(t=13.856、8.203,P<0.001),但两组病人术中出血量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。MIS-TKA组病人的直腿抬高训练开始时间、首次下床活动时间、膝关节活动度及美国特种外科医院膝关节评分(HSS评分)均优于传统TKA组(t=-10.814~18.914,P<0.001)。术后2d,MISTKA组病人的静息VAS评分显著低于传统TKA组(F=3.143,P<0.05);术后1~4d,MIS-TKA组病人的活动VAS评分、CRP、ESR及双侧膝关节皮温差均低于传统TKA组(F=2.358~13.802,P<0.05)。两组病人术后均未发生感染、下肢深静脉血栓形成等并发症。结论MIS-TKA对病人创伤较小,可在一定程度上降低炎症反应,缓解疼痛,有利于提高病人膝关节活动度,促进关节功能恢复。 Objective To investigate the early postoperative clinical effect of minimally invasive surgery-total knee arthroplasty(MIS-TKA)versus conventional TKA.Methods From September to December in 2018,90 patients with knee osteoarthritis(KOA)who needed unilateral TKA were randomly divided into conventional TKA group and MIS-TKA group,with 45 patients in each group.The two groups were compared in terms of surgery-related conditions,postoperative rehabilitation of joint function,Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)scores of resting and active pain at different time points,inflammatory indicators(erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR)and C-reactive protein(CRP)),and skin temperature difference between bilateral knee joints,and the incidence rates of postoperative complications.Results Compared with the conventional TKA group,the MIS-TKA group had a significantly shorter incision length and a significantly longer time of operation(t=13.856,8.203;P<0.001),while there was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between the two groups(P>0.05).Compared with the conventional TKA group,the MIS-TKA group had significantly better starting time of straight leg elevation training,time to first ambulation,range of knee motion,and Hospital for Special Surgery knee rating score(t=-10.814 to 18.914,P<0.001).On day 2 after surgery,the MIS-TKA group had a significantly lower resting VAS score than the conventional TKA group(F=3.143,P<0.05),and compared with the conventional TKA group on days 1-4 after surgery,the MIS-TKA group had significantly lower active VAS score,CRP,ESR,and skin temperature difference between bilateral knee joints(F=2.358-13.802,P<0.05).No patient experienced the complications such as infection and deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremities.Conclusion MIS-TKA is less traumatic to patients and can reduce inflammatory response and alleviate pain to a certain extent,thereby helping to improve the range of knee motion and promote the recovery of joint function.
作者 王田田 李海燕 苏晴晴 李延江 张子安 陈伯华 WANG Tiantian;LI Haiyan;SU Qingqing;LI Yanjiang;ZHANG Zian;CHEN Bohua(School of Nursing,Qingdao University,Qingdao 266071,China)
出处 《青岛大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2022年第4期584-589,共6页 Journal of Qingdao University(Medical Sciences)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(81802151) 中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目(2018M642616) 青岛大学医学部“临床医学+X”面上项目(20181018)。
关键词 最小侵入性外科手术 关节成形术 置换 疗效比较研究 minimally invasive surgical procedures arthroplasty,replacement,knee comparative effectiveness research
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献43

  • 1Dabboussi N,Sakr M,Girard J,et al. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty:a comparative study to the standard approach [J]. N Am J Med Sci ,2012,4(2) :81-85.
  • 2Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, et al. Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system[J]. Clin Orthop, 1989,248 : 13-14.
  • 3Varela-Egocheaga JR,Sudrez-Suarez MA,Femandez-Villdn M,et M. Minimally invasive subvastus approach:improving the results oftotal knee arthroplasty :a prospective,randomized trial[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2010,468:1200-1208.
  • 4Haas SB,Manitta MA,Burdick P. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty:the mini midvastus approach[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2006,452:112-116.
  • 5Chiang H, Lee CC ,Lin WP, eta/. Comparison of quadriceps-sparing minimally invasive and medial parapatellar total knee arthroplasty:a 2-year follow-up study[J]. J Formos Med Assoc, 2012,111(12):698.
  • 6William CS,Paul JD,Mary ER,et a/. Mini-subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2008,23:19-25.
  • 7Mortazavi S M, Vegari D, Ho A, Zmistowski B, et al. Two-stage exchange arthroplasty for infected total knee arthroplasty: predic- tors of failure [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011,469 ( 11 ) : 3049 - 3054.
  • 8Bozie K J, Ries M D. The impact of infectiong after totai hip arthro- plasty on hospital and surgen resource utilization [J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2005,87 ( 8 ) : 1746 - 1751.
  • 9Berbari E, Mabry T, Tsaras G, et al. Inflammatory blood laboratory levels as markers of prosthetic joint infection : a systematic review and meta-analysis [ J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2010,92 ( 11 ) : 2102 - 2109.
  • 10Stahelova A, Mrazek F, Smizansky M, et al. Variation in the ILl B, TNF and IL6 genes and individual susceptibility to prosthetic jointinfection [J]. BMC Immunol, 2012,13 ( 8 ) : 25 - 29.

共引文献91

同被引文献28

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部