期刊文献+

幼儿气质、共同养育关系和入园适应的关系 被引量:1

The Associations Among Child Temperament,Coparenting Relationship and Adjustment to Preschool
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:检验共同养育关系在幼儿气质和入园适应之间的中介作用。方法:采用3-7岁儿童气质问卷(PTQ)、共同养育关系量表(CRS)以及入园适应教师问卷,于新小班开学一个月后调查了来自上海市三所公办一级园的250户幼儿及其家庭。结果:共同养育关系分别在幼儿气质的适应性、反应强度、趋避性维度和入园适应之间起完全中介作用,而在气质的其余几个维度和入园适应之间的中介效应不显著。结论:共同养育关系在幼儿气质和入园适应之间起完全中介作用。 Objective:The mediating role of coparenting relationship in the association between child temperament and the adjustment to preschool was examined.Methods:The Parent Temperament Questionnaire(PTQ),the Coparenting Relationship Scale(CRS),and the Preschool Adjustment Questionnaire were administrated to 250 families with preschoolers aged 3-7 from three first-level public kindergartens in Shanghai,China,one month after preschool entry.Results:coparenting relationship fully mediated the effects of adapt⁃ability,intensity of reaction,and approach or withdrawal on adjustment to preschool,respectively,while no significant mediating effects were found between the other dimensions of temperament and preschool adjustment.Conclusion:coparenting relationship played a ful⁃ly mediating role between child temperament and his/her adjustment to preschool.
作者 巫筱媛 WU Xiao-yuan(Department of Early Childhood Education,The Education University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong 999077,China)
出处 《陕西学前师范学院学报》 2022年第9期1-8,共8页 Journal of Shaanxi Xueqian Normal University
关键词 入园适应 过渡 气质 共同养育关系 中介作用 adjustment to preschool transition temperament coparenting relationship mediating effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献145

  • 1周宗奎.亲子关系作用机制的心理学分析[J].西南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1997,29(2):50-54. 被引量:30
  • 2刘文,杨丽珠.基于教师评定的3~9岁儿童气质结构[J].心理学报,2005,37(1):67-72. 被引量:35
  • 3刘晓东.从学习取向到成长取向:中国学前教育变革的方向[J].学前教育研究,2006(4):16-20. 被引量:42
  • 4[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10
  • 5[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
  • 6[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606
  • 7[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246
  • 8[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255
  • 9[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353
  • 10[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136~ 162

共引文献1726

同被引文献19

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部