期刊文献+

真空辅助旋切术治疗无异形乳腺导管内乳头状瘤的疗效与预后的Meta分析 被引量:4

Efficacy and prognosis of vacuum-assisted excision for benign intraductal papilloma of breast:A meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价真空辅助旋切术治疗无异形乳腺导管内乳头状瘤的安全性及有效性。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、万方医学、中国知网、维普、中国生物医学文献服务系统等电子数据库,按照纳入与排除标准筛选文献后,使用Cochrane手册及纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行文献质量评价,采用Review Manager 5.3软件进行效应量的合并分析。结果:最终纳入9篇文献,共1016例患者。真空辅助旋切手术对比开放手术出血量少[MD=-6.38,95%CI(-9.90,-2.86),P<0.05];术后并发症少[RR=0.43,95%CI(0.29,0.64),P<0.05];术后引流量[MD=-2.56,95%CI(-4.97,-0.15),P<0.05]及引流时间[MD=-0.25,95%CI(-0.40,-0.09),P<0.05]均低于开放组;术后复发率低[RR=0.26,95%CI(0.14,0.49),P<0.05],但在手术时间上与开放手术相比则差异无统计学意义[SD=-12.82,95%CI(-25.70,0.06),P=0.05]。结论:真空辅助旋切术比开放手术具有出血量少、术后引流量少及引流时间短、术后并发症少的优势,但在手术时间上与开放手术相比则无统计学意义,另外本研究在复发率的对比上真空微创旋切术显示了复发率低的优势,但仍需长期动态观察。 Objective:To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of vacuum-assisted excision for benign intraductal papilloma of breast.Methods:The databases including PubMed,Embase,Cochrane Library,WangFang,CNIK,VIP and Web of Science were searched by computer,according the inclusion and exclusion criteria after screening of literature.The Cochrane handbook and Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to evaluate the studies.Then the Review Manager 5.3 software was to used analyze the data.Results:A total of 1016 patients was included in 9 articles.The amount of blood loss in vacuum-assisted surgery was less than that in open surgery[MD=-6.38,95%CI(-9.90,-2.86),P<0.05].The drainage[MD=-2.56,95%CI(-4.97,-0.15),P<0.05]and drainage time[MD=-0.25,95%CI(-0.40,-0.09),P<0.05]in vacuum-assisted surgery was less than that in open surgery.There were also few postoperative complications than that in open surgery[RR=0.43,95%CI(0.29,0.64),P<0.05].Compared with open surgery,the postoperative recurrence rate was lower in vacuum-assisted surgery[RR=0.26,95%CI(0.14,0.49),P<0.05].Last,there was no statistically significant difference in the operative time between vacuum-assisted surgery and open surgery,[SD=-12.82,95%CI(-25.70,0.06),P=0.05].Conclusion:Compared with open surgery,vacuum-assisted excision has the advantages of less blood loss and lower postoperative complications,but the operative time is not statistically significant compared with open surgery.In addition,compared with open surgery in this study,vacuum-assisted excision has the advantages of lower recurrence rate,but it still needs long-term dynamic observation.
作者 苏亚静 吴焕良 陈运景 何贵省 吴煌福 SU Ya-jing;WU Huan-liang;CHEN Yun-jing;HE Gui-sheng;WU Huang-fu(Hainan Medical University,Haikou 570100,China;Hainan Cancer Hospital,Haikou 570100,China;The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University,Haikou 570100,China)
出处 《海南医学院学报》 CAS 2022年第17期1335-1342,共8页 Journal of Hainan Medical University
基金 海南省重点研发计划项目(ZDYF2017087) 海南医学院第二附属医院院内课题[海医二附院(2018-11)]。
关键词 乳腺导管内乳头状瘤 真空辅助微创旋切术 META分析 疗效 预后 Intraductal papilloma of breast Vacuum-assisted excision Meta analysis Effect Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献116

  • 1易文君,唐中华,陈干农,徐锋.乳管镜、B超引导Mammotome系统切除活检乳管内病灶13例[J].中华普通外科杂志,2006,21(2):153-153. 被引量:12
  • 2骆成玉.乳腺导管内乳头状瘤:现实的诊断手段及外科处理[J].临床外科杂志,2007,15(6):371-372. 被引量:13
  • 3万芸,游玉梅,黄伟康,黄宇辉.乳腺导管内乳头状瘤与不典型乳头状瘤的临床及X线特征比较[J].广东医学,2007,28(8):1297-1298. 被引量:1
  • 4Gulay H,Bora S,Kilicturgay S,et al.Management of nipple discharge.J Am Coil Surg,1994,178:471-474.
  • 5INGVAR C. Papillary secretion: diagnostic assessment and treatment[J]. Scand J Srug, 2002, 91(3) : 246 -250.
  • 6BROOLES M J, BOURKE A G. Radiological appearance of papilla- ry breast lesions[J]. Clin Radiol, 2008, 63(11 ) : 1265 -1273.
  • 7Fine RE, Israel PZ, Walker LC, et al. A prospective study of the removal rate of imaged breast lesion by an 11G gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy probe system[J]. Am J Surg, 2001, 182(3): 335-340.
  • 8Chun K, Velanovich V. Patient perceived cosmesis and satisfaction after breast biopsy: comparison of stereotactic incision, excisional, and wire localized biopsy techniques [J]. Surgery, 2002, 131(5): 497-501.
  • 9Enrico C, Linei A, Maria P, et al. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy: experience with 406 cases [J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2007, 102(1): 103-110.
  • 10Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version S. 0. 1 [updated September 2008] [M]. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2008: 193-194.

共引文献162

同被引文献61

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部