期刊文献+

盐酸美沙酮片治疗难治性癌痛患者的临床观察研究 被引量:2

Clinical Observation of the Effectiveness of Methadone in Refractory Carcinous Pain Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景美沙酮属于强阿片类药物,在难治性癌痛的治疗中有其独特的优势,但同时美沙酮具有t1/2长、易引起药物蓄积等特性,个体差异大,因此其剂量的把握及转换较为复杂,且在需要较大剂量阿片类药物的患者中应用经验更为有限。目的探讨盐酸美沙酮片治疗难治性癌痛患者的疗效和安全性。方法选取2017年7月至2021年12月在中国科学院大学附属肿瘤医院(浙江省肿瘤医院)住院的100例难治性癌痛患者为研究对象,采用美沙酮快速转换或3天转换法进行美沙酮转换,统计转换后1周及2周美沙酮剂量,同时记录美沙酮转换前后日平均疼痛强度〔以疼痛数字评分法(NRS)评分评价〕、爆发痛次数及不良反应等,对难治性癌痛患者美沙酮转换的疗效和安全性进行分析。结果吗啡与美沙酮存在动态转换比关系,吗啡日剂量越大,与美沙酮之间的转换比也越大。100例难治性癌痛患者中有96例患者最终完成美沙酮转换,与转换前相比,96例患者美沙酮转换后1周、2周平均NRS评分、爆发痛次数均降低(P<0.05)。96例患者美沙酮转换后1周,最严重疼痛强度和平均疼痛强度的有效缓解率分别为68.8%和75.0%;转换后2周,最严重疼痛强度和平均疼痛强度的有效缓解率分别为69.8%和77.1%。美沙酮的不良反应主要有口干、恶心、呕吐、便秘、头晕和冷汗等;与转换前相比,转换后1周、2周恶心(χ^(2)_(配对)=7.005、8.233)、呕吐(χ^(2)_(配对)=5.581、10.907)发生率均降低(P<0.05)。结论本研究通过临床实践证实美沙酮可降低难治性癌痛患者的平均NRS评分、爆发痛次数,对患者的疼痛强度有一定缓解作用,并能降低部分不良反应发生率。 Background As a strong opioid,methadone has unique advantages in relieving refractory carcinous pain,but also has some limitations,such as higher risk of accumulation due to long elimination half-life,difficulties in dosage calculation and dose conversion due to significant differences between individuals,and limited clinical evidence on the use of this medicine in large doses.Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of methadone conversion in patients with refractory carcinous pain.Methods A total of 100 inpatients with refractory carcinous pain were recruited from Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences/Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from July 2017 to December 2021.The conversion of morphine to methadone was carried out by rapid conversion or 3-day conversion method.The doses of methadone used at one week and two weeks after the conversion,the daily mean pain intensity assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale(NRS),number of breakthrough pain and adverse reactions before and after methadone conversion were recorded.The efficacy and safety of methadone conversion were analyzed.Results There was a dynamic conversion ratio between morphine and methadone.The conversion ratio between morphine and methadone increased with the growth of the daily dose of morphine.Ninety-six cases finally completed methadone conversion.The mean NRS score and the number of breakthrough pain were significantly reduced at one week or two weeks after the conversion(P<0.05).The rate of the most severe pain relief and the rate of average pain relief were 68.8%and 75.0%,respectively,at one week after methadone conversion,and were 69.8%,and 77.1%respectively,at two weeks after methadone conversion.The main adverse reactions to methadone included dry mouth,nausea,vomiting,constipation,dizziness and cold sweat.Compared with before conversion,the incidence of nausea(χ^(2) _(pair)=7.005,8.233)and vomiting(χ^(2) _(pair)=5.581,10.907)were decreased at one week and two weeks after conversion(P<0.05).Conclusion This study confirmed through clinical practice that methadone can reduce the mean NRS score and the number of breakthrough pain in patients with refractory cancer pain,relieve the pain intensity of patients to a certain extent,and reduce the incidence of some adverse reactions.
作者 周琴飞 龚黎燕 ZHOU Qinfei;GONG Liyan(Department of Rare Cancer&Head and Neck Medical Oncology,Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences/Zhejiang Cancer Hospital,Hangzhou 310022,China;Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer(IBMC),Chinese Academy of Sciences,Hangzhou 310000,China)
出处 《中国全科医学》 CAS 北大核心 2022年第32期4023-4028,共6页 Chinese General Practice
基金 浙江省中医药科技计划项目(2019ZB018) 浙江省自然科学基金资助项目(LY19H290001) 浙江省医药卫生科技项目(2018KY312,2020374375)。
关键词 癌性疼痛 美沙酮 镇痛药 阿片类 吗啡 难治性癌痛 阿片类药物转换 疗效和安全性 不良反应 Cancer pain Methadone Analgesics,opioid Morphine Refractory carcinous pain Opioid conversion Efficacy and safety Adverse reactions
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献20

  • 1Nicholson AB. Methadone for cancer pain[ J]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2007, Issue 4. Art. No. : CD003971.
  • 2Bruera E, Palmer JL, Bosnjak S, et al. Methadone versus morphine as a first - line strong opioid for cancer pain: a randomized, double - blind study[ J]. J Clin Oncol. 2004, 22(1) : 185 - 192.
  • 3Kao DP, Haigney MC, Mehler PS, et al. Arrhythmia associated with buprenorphine and methadone reported to the Food and Drug Administration. Addiction. 2015, 110 (9) : 1468 - 1475.
  • 4Moss A J, Schwartz PJ, Crampton RS, et al. The long QT syndrome. Prospective longitudinal study of 328 families [ J ]. Circulation. 1991, 84(3) : 1136 - 1144.
  • 5Zareba W, Moss A J, Schwartz PJ, et al. Influence of genotype on the clinical course of the long - QT syndrome. International Long- QT Syndrome Registry Research Group[J]. N Engl J Med. 1998, 339(14) : 960 -965.
  • 6Woosley RL, Chen Y, Freiman JP, et al. Mechanism of the eardiotoxic actions of terfenadine [ J ]. JAMA. 1993, 269 (12) : 1532 - 1536.
  • 7De Bruin ML, Langendijk PN, Koopmans RP, et al. In -hospital cardiac arrest is associated with use of non -antiarrhythmic QTc -prolonging drugs[J]. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007, 63(2) : 216 -223.
  • 8Reddy S, Hui D, E10B, et al. The effect of oral methadone on the QTc interval in advanced cancer patients : a prospective pilot study. J Palliat Med. 2010, 13(1) : 33 -38.
  • 9Mercadante S, Prestia G, Adile C, et al. Changes of QTc interval after opioid switching to oral methadone. Support Care Cancer. 2013, 21(12) : 3421 -3424.
  • 10Van Den Beuken - Van EM, Geurts JW, Patijn J. Prolonged QT interval by methadone: relevance for daily practice? A prospective study in patients with cancer and noncancer pain. J Opioid Manag. 2013, 9 (4) : 263 -267.

共引文献185

同被引文献39

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部