中考数学试卷SOLO层次比较研究——以2019~2021年贵阳市中考数学试卷为例

A comparative study on SOLO levels of mathematics papers of secondary school entrance examinations:A case study of the mathematics papers of 2019~2021 Guiyang secondary school entrance examination

基于SOLO分类理论,从SOLO层次、主题和题型类别3个方面分别对2019~2021年贵阳市中考数学试卷进行分析.结果显示:贵阳卷SOLO层次考查力度为多元结构>关联结构>单点结构>拓展抽象结构;各主题考查力度为图形的变化与坐标>函数>统计与概率>图形的性质>方程与不等式>数与式,其中图形的变化与坐标SOLO层次水平最高,数与式、方程与不等式以及概率与统计SOLO层次水平较为稳定;题型类别呈现填空题、选择题考查单点结构层次较多,解答题考查多元结构和关联结构较多.建议:教师实施分层教学并兼顾拓展练习,同时紧密联系生活实际,渗透思政教育;学生注重基础知识学习,提高综合运用能力;命题者运用SOLO分类理论命制试卷,丰富试卷思维结构层次.

Based on the SOLO Taxonomy theory,the mathematics examination papers of Guiyang secondary school entrance examination from 2019 to 2021 were analyzed in three aspects:SOLO levels,themes and test question categories.The results showed that the SOLO level test intensity of Guiyang volume was multistructural>relational>unistructural>extended abstract structure;the test intensity of each theme was the graphic transformation and coordinates>functions>statistics and probability>properties of graphs>equations and inequalities>numbers and formulas,with graphic changes and coordinates at the highest SOLO level,with numbers and formulas,equations and inequalities,the statistics and probability at a more stable SOLO level;patterns of test questions demonstrated that more unistructural levels were tested in blank-filling questions and multiple-choice questions,while more multistructural and relational levels were tested in answering questions.It was recommended that teachers should implement hierarchical teaching and taking account of the extension practice,meanwhile closely combine with the reality of life and infiltrate the ideological and political education;students should pay attention to basic knowledge and improve comprehensive application ability;test paper proposers should use the SOLO Taxonomy to set the questions and enrich the thinking structure levels of test papers.