期刊文献+

后期维特根斯坦“语言实践”概念辨析 被引量:1

An Analysis of Later Wittgenstein’s Concept of “Linguistic Practice”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 维特根斯坦不仅是推动“语言转向”的中坚人物,而且在其后期哲学中一改前期对语言的看法,在生活之流中辨析语言的实际使用。他通过对语言实践进行详细的语法分析,探寻哲学问题产生的真正根源,带来对哲学性质和方法的颠覆性理解。后期维特根斯坦对语言实践的语法研究,成为20世纪下半叶哲学的“实践转向”的重要思想来源,不断启发人们对人类实践活动尤其与语言密切相关的实践活动的哲学探究。 Ludwig Wittgenstein was not only a key figure to promote the “linguistic turn” in his early philosophy,but also changed his view of language in his later philosophy in which a language was analyzed by its practical use in a flow of life.By his detailed grammatic analysis of the linguistic practice,he pursued the genuine resources of philosophical problems and brought a subversive understanding in the nature and method of philosophy.The grammatic investigation of linguistic practice by later Wittgenstein became an important thought resource of the “practical turn” in philosophy beginning from the second part of the twentieth century,and has inspired continuously the philosophical investigation in human practical activities,especially the ones intimately related with language.
作者 张学广 ZHANG Xue-guang(School of Philosophy,Northwest University,Xi’an 710127,China)
出处 《西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第5期50-59,共10页 Journal of Northwest University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基金 陕西省社会科学基金年度项目(2022C041) 国家社会科学基金项目“马克思与维特根斯坦哲学比较研究”。
关键词 后期维特根斯坦 语言实践 语法研究 实践哲学 later Wittgenstein linguistic practice grammatic investigation practical philosophy
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献14

  • 1Martin Heidegger, The Basic Problems of Phenomenology, Trans. Albert Hofstadter, Blooming: Indiana University Press, 1982, p. 276.
  • 2Robert Brandom, Making It Explicit, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994, p. 20. pp. 27 -28.
  • 3David Bloor, Wittenstein, Rules and Institutions, London and New York: Routledge, 1997, pp. 4 - 5.
  • 4Barry Barnes, Practice as Collective Action, in The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, ed. Theodore R. Schatzki, et al. , New York: Routledge, 2001, p. 22.
  • 5Joseph Rouse, Engaging Science, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1996, p. 138.
  • 6Stephen Turner, Explaining Normativity, Philosophy of the Social Sciences: 37(1) , 2007, p. 58.
  • 7Joseph Rouse, Social Practices and Normativity, Philosophy of the Social Sciences : 37 ( 1 ) , p. 52.
  • 8Stephen Turner, The Social Theory of Practices, Chicago: The University Chicago Press, 1994, p. 1. p. 36. p. 79.
  • 9David, Stern, The Practical Turn, in The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of the Social Sciences, ed. Stephen Turner and Paul Roth, Oxford: Blackwell, 2003, p 188.
  • 10Hubert Dreyfus, How Heidegger Defends the Possibility of a Correspondence Theory of Truth With Respect to the Entities of Natural Science, in The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, ed. Theodore Schatzki et al. , New York: Routledge, 2001, p. 152.

共引文献15

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部