期刊文献+

警察培训评估主体的评估能力困境、成因及破解之道——基于历史制度主义视角 被引量:1

Difficulties,Causes and Solutions of Evaluation Ability of Police Training Evaluation Subject——A Perspective Based on Historical Institutionalism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当前,警察培训评估主体的评估能力存在评估主体缺乏“培训需要评估”的理念和先进的评估技术,评估主体结构不合理的困境。导致警察培训评估主体评估能力困境的原因在于警察培训评估主体以非策略性行动保持消极评估理念,评估主体因维护沉没成本而怠于提升评估技术,警察培训评估主体追求报酬递增固化了不合理的主体结构。突破警察培训评估主体评估能力困境需要打破警察培训评估主体陈旧的评估观念,提升警察培训评估主体的技术水平,调整警察培训内部评估主体及其与外部评估主体的关系。 At present,the evaluation ability of police training evaluation subject has the dilemma that the evaluation subject lacks the concept of“training needs evaluation”and the advanced evaluation technology,and the evaluation subject structure is unreasonable.The reasons for the evaluation ability dilemma of the police training evaluation subject are that the police training evaluation subject maintains the negative evaluation concept with non strategic action,the police training evaluation subject is lazy to improve the evaluation technology due to maintaining the sunk cost,and the police training evaluation subject solidifies the unreasonable subject structure in pursuit of the increasing return.To break through the dilemma of the evaluation ability of the police training evaluation subject,we should eliminate the old evaluation concept of the police training evaluation subject,improve the technical level of the police training evaluation subject,and adjust the relationship between the internal police training evaluation subject and the external police training evaluation subject.
作者 刘克华 范妮妮 LIU Ke-hua;FAN Ni-ni(Department of Ideological&Political Theory Course Teaching,Shanxi Police College)
出处 《教育理论与实践》 北大核心 2022年第24期50-53,共4页 Theory and Practice of Education
基金 2019年公安部软科学项目“新时代公安机关治警方略理论与实践研究”(项目编号:2019LLYJSXST011)阶段性研究成果。
关键词 警察培训 评估主体 评估观念 评估能力 评估技术 评估主体结构 police training evaluation subject evaluation concept evaluation ability evaluation technology evaluation subject structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献62

  • 1邵祖峰,王秀华.公安民警在职培训质量评估指标体系构建与综合评价[J].北京人民警察学院学报,2008(2):95-97. 被引量:7
  • 2吴绍琪,冉景亮.政府绩效评估主体的研究[J].软科学,2006,20(6):66-68. 被引量:5
  • 3蔡小慎,刘雅静.试论公务员培训质量评估的主体构成[J].前沿,2007(8):89-91. 被引量:3
  • 4叶海卡·德洛尔 王满传 译.逆境中的政策制定[M].上海:上海远东出版社,1996..
  • 5B. Guy Peters. Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism [ M ]. London and NewYork: Wellington House, 1999:6- 11.
  • 6James G. March, Johan P. Olin Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics [ M ] New York: The Free Press, 1989 3.
  • 7James G. March, Johan P. Olsen. The New Institutionalismi Organizational Factors in Political Life [J]. The American Political Science Review, 1984 (3) : 738.
  • 8B·盖伊.彼得斯..政治制度:旧与新[C]....政治科学新手册:上册..北京:生活.读书.新知三联书店,,2006..305..
  • 9David Brian Roberston. The Return to History and the New Institutionalism in American Political Science [J]. Social Science Histoty, 1993 (1):3.
  • 10Peter Hall, Rosemary C. R. Taylor. Political Science and The Three New Institutionalism [ J ]. Political Studies, 1996, (4).

共引文献106

同被引文献14

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部