期刊文献+

快慢读者利用语境信息的差异:加工深度的作用 被引量:1

Differences in Contextual Information Utilization Between Fast and Slow Readers:The Role of Processing Depth
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过主题扫描和阅读理解两种加工深度不同的任务,考察快慢读者预测性效应差异的来源及加工深度在其中发挥的作用。被试在两种任务情境下阅读分别包含高低预测性目标词的96个句子框架,记录其眼动轨迹。结果显示:预测性效应仅在阅读理解任务中出现,快速读者在早期眼动指标上就表现出了预测性效应,慢速读者在晚期眼动指标上才表现出预测性效应。结果表明:加工深度调节快慢读者预测性效应的大小;在自然阅读情境下快慢读者的预测性效应表现符合预测编码框架假设。 This study examined the source of predictability effect differences between fast and slow readers and the role of processing depth in two tasks(i.e., topic scanning and reading comprehension) with different processing depths. Participants read 96 sentence frames embedded with high and low predictive target words in two task situations while their eye movements were recorded by an eye tracker. The results showed that the predictability effect only appeared in reading comprehension task, with fast readers showing predictive effect in the early stage while slow readers showing predictive effect in the later stage. The results suggest that processing depth moderates the predictability effect of fast and slow readers. In addition, during natural reading, the predictability effect of fast and slow readers conforms to the predictive coding framework hypothesis.
作者 仝文 余雪 刘志方 朱星宇 齐琦 TONG Wen;YU Xue;LIU Zhifang;ZHU Xingyu;QI Qi(College of Educational Science,Shanxi Normal University,Taiyuan 030031;College of Education,Hangzhou Normal University,Hangzhou 311121;School of Psychology,Hainan Normal University,Haikou 571158)
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第4期450-456,共7页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 全国教育科学规划一般课题(BBA190023)。
关键词 阅读速度 预测性效应 主题扫描 阅读理解 reading speed word predictability effect topic scanning reading comprehension
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献79

  • 1李海霞.从一组统计数据看词的切分等问题[J].汉语学习,1997(6):13-15. 被引量:2
  • 2王穗苹,莫雷.篇章阅读理解中背景信息的通达[J].心理学报,2001,33(4):312-319. 被引量:23
  • 3白学军,周源源.语境因素对阅读时眼动控制的影响:来自汉语句子语境的证据[J].心理与行为研究,2005,3(3):165-168. 被引量:6
  • 4Altarriba, J., Kambe, G., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2001). Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: Evidence from fluent Spanish-English bilinguals. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 875–890.
  • 5Angele, B., Timothy J., Slattery, Yang, J., Kliegl, R., & Rayner, K. (2008). Parafoveal processing in reading: Manipulating n+1 and n+2 previews simultaneously. Psychology Press: Visual Cognition, 16(6), 697–707.
  • 6Braze, D., Shankweiler, D., Ni, W., & Palumbo, L. C. (2002). Readers’ eye movements distinguish anomalies of form and content. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(1), 25–44.
  • 7Chen, H- C. (1992). Reading Comprehension in Chinese: Some implications from character reading times. In H.-C. Chen & O.Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 175–205). Amsterdan: North-Holland (Elsevier).
  • 8Chen, H- C. (1999). How do readers of Chinese process words during reading for comprehension? In: Wang, J., Inhof, A. W., Chen, H-C (Eds). Reading Chinese Script: A Cognitive Analysis (pp. 257–278). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • 9Chen, H- C., Song, H., Lau, W. Y., Wong, K. F. E., & Tang, S. (2003). Developmental characteristics of eye movements in reading Chinese. In C. McBride-Chang & H-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Development in Chinese Children (pp. 157–169). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • 10Chen, H- C., & Tang, C. (1998). The effective visual field in Chinese. Reading and Writing, 10, 245–254.

共引文献57

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部