期刊文献+

新业态从业者集体劳权的实现路径——以集体劳动法和反垄断法的协调为视角 被引量:2

The Realization of Collective Labor Rights of Practitioners in New Business Forms-From the Perspective of the Coordination of Collective Labor Law and Antitrust Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从本质上来说,集体劳动法和反垄断法是相互对立的:反垄断法维护公平竞争;集体劳动法鼓励工人联合以“限制竞争”。鉴于集体劳动法是为了保护居于弱势地位的劳动者权益并致力于实现特定的社会政策目标,因而,反垄断法中设立了劳工豁免制度。但随着平台及数字经济的发展,不具有雇员身份的新业态从业人员易被反垄断法视为具有经济实体地位的“企业”,难以适用传统反垄断劳工豁免,从而其行使集体劳权的行为会被认定为价格固定的“横向卡特尔”。为破解上述困境,一方面,可以扩大传统反垄断劳工豁免的适用范围;另一方面,可以对特定类型的新业态从业者设立竞争承诺制度,从而消除其集体行动所带来的反竞争风险。在我国,应将具有劳动关系或事实劳动关系的单位就业员工、不完全劳动关系的“平台网约劳动者”纳入反垄断劳工豁免的范围,并明确豁免的适用条件;同时,还要设立针对“依托平台的个人灵活就业人员”集体行为的竞争承诺规则。 In essence,the collective labor law and the anti-monopoly law are opposed to each other:the anti monopoly law maintains fair competition;the collective labour law encourages workers to unite to"limit competition".In view of the fact that the collective labor law aims to protect the rights and interests of workers in a vulnerable position and is committed to achieving specific social policy objectives,the anti-monopoly law has established a labor ex⁃emption system.However,with the development of the platform and the digital economy,new business workers without employee status are easy to be regarded as"enterprises"with economic entity status by the anti-monopoly law,and it is difficult to apply the traditional anti-monopoly labor exemption,so their exercise of collective labor rights will be recognized as a"horizontal cartel"with fixed prices.In order to solve the above dilemma,on the one hand,we can expand the scope of application of traditional anti-monopoly labor exemption.On the other hand,a"competition commitment"system can be set up for new practitioners of specific types to eliminate the anti competitive risks brought about by their"collective action".In China,we should include employees employed by employers with employment relations or de facto employment relations,and workers engaged in"platform networking"with incomplete employment relations into the scope of anti-monopoly labor exemption,and specify the applicable conditions of exemption;at the same time,we should establish competition commitment rules for the collective behavior of"individual flexible workers relying on the platform".
作者 葛家欣 Ge Jiaxin
机构地区 武汉大学法学院
出处 《理论月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第8期116-126,共11页 Theory Monthly
基金 国家社会科学基金青年项目“数字经济下我国劳动法面临的挑战与转型研究”(19CFX077)。
关键词 新业态从业者 集体劳权 集体劳动法 反垄断法 workers of new business forms collective labor rights collective labor law antitrust law
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献87

  • 1田思路.工业4.0时代的从属劳动论[J].法学评论,2019,37(1):76-85. 被引量:88
  • 2陈小瑾,陈磊.中国将为《劳动合同法》付出代价[J].南方人物周刊,2007,0(29):23-24. 被引量:6
  • 3程延园."劳动三权":构筑现代劳动法律的基础[J].中国人民大学学报,2005,19(2):101-107. 被引量:29
  • 4侯玲玲,王全兴.劳动法上劳动者概念之研究[J].云南大学学报(法学版),2006,19(1):67-74. 被引量:95
  • 5托马斯·寇肯、哈瑞·卡兹、罗伯特·麦克西.《美国产业关系的转型》,朱飞、王侃译,北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2008年,第9页.
  • 6常凯.《关于罢工合法性的法律分析-以南海本田罢工为案例的研究》[J].战略与管理,2010,(7).
  • 7《劳动合同法实施后合同签订率由不足20%提升至93%》,http://news.xinhuanet.com/legal/2009-03/09/content_10977393.htm,2011年6月20日访问.
  • 8陈佩华.革命乎?组合主义乎?-后毛泽东时期的工会和工人运动.当代中国研究,1994,.
  • 9常凯.《工潮问题的调查与分析》[A]..《当代工会文丛》第一辑[C].工人出版社,1988年版.第56页.
  • 10《马克思恩格斯全集》,第48卷,第12页,北京,人民出版社,1985年版

共引文献494

同被引文献56

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部