科技成果评价中专家评级模型研究

Research on the expert rating model in the evaluation of scientific and technological achievements

科技成果评价指对科研成果的工作质量、学术水平、实际应用和成熟程度等予以客观、具体、恰当的评价。科技成果评价的指标体系繁多,且需要多名专家参与,从理论模型上属于多属性群决策理论范畴。目前,大型科技项目评审均需要建立专家库,需要综合考虑专家的专业背景、从事工作、实践经验以及参与项目评审活动的评价等因素,对专家进行评级和打分,实现专家库的动态管理。因此,如何对专家在项目评审和成果评价活动中的水平进行评价,是目前研究的热点问题。借助多属性决策理论,根据专家评分与群体决策之间的关联关系,给出了专家熵权求解方法,构建适用于科技成果评价的专家评级模型,并用算例验证其可行性。下一步需要在实际的科研项目评审活动中探索相关参数的设置。

Evaluation of scientific and technological achievements refers to the objective evaluation of the work quality, academic level, practical application and maturity of scientific research achievements.There are many index systems for the evaluation of scientific and technological achievements, and they need the participation of many experts, which belongs to the category of multi-attribute group decision-making theory in terms of theoretical model.At present, the evaluation of large-scale science and technology projects needs to establish an expert database, which needs to comprehensively consider the factors of experts’ professional background, work, practical experience and the evaluation of project evaluation activities, so as to realize the dynamic management of the expert database.Therefore, how to evaluate the level of experts in the project evaluation and achievement evaluation activities is a hot issue in the current research.With the help of multi-attribute decision-making theory, according to the correlation between expert score and group decision-making, gives the expert entropy solution method, build an expert rating model suitable for the evaluation of scientific and technological achievements, and verify its feasibility, the next step needs to explore the relevant parameters in the actual scientific research project review activities.