期刊文献+

建构水平理论对新时代大学生爱国主义教育的启示

Construal Level Theory on College Students Patriotic Education in the New Era
下载PDF
导出
摘要 爱国主义教育的现实局限与历史使命迫切要求思政工作者加强和改进新时代爱国主义教育的创新实践。本研究基于学科融合的视角,借鉴建构水平理论和心理距离的研究成果,探讨了时间距离与社会距离对大学生爱国主义认知、情感与行为培育的影响,提出了未来开展实证研究和实践探索的路径,有助于进一步提升对当代大学生新时代对爱国主义主流价值观的认知规律和接受特点的把握,从而为思想政治教育工作者和新闻宣传部门提供开展新时代爱国主义创新教育的心理学依据。 The practical limitations and historical mission of patriotism education urgently require ideological and political workers to strengthen and improve the innovative practice of patriotism education in the new era.Based on the perspective of discipline integration,the construction level theory and psychological distance,this study discusses the influence of time distance and social distance on patriotism cognition,emotion and behavior cultivation,puts forward the future empirical research and practice exploration path,which is helpful to further improve the new era of the mainstream values of patriotism and acceptance characteristics,thus providing psychological basis for ideological and political educators and patriotism innovation education in the new era.
作者 陈庆宾 吴素红 CHEN Qing-bin;WU Su-hong(Hangzhou College of Commerce,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310018,China)
出处 《湖北开放职业学院学报》 2022年第17期133-135,共3页 Journal of Hubei Open Vocational College
基金 教育部高校思想政治工作队伍培训研修中心(广西师范大学)2020年度思想政治工作队伍专项课题“心理距离视阈下新时代大学生爱国主义认知情感与行为机制研究”阶段性成果(项目编号:2020YB007) 浙江工商大学杭州商学院2021年度党建研究一般课题“心理距离视阈下新时代大学生爱国主义情感培育机制研究”阶段性成果。
关键词 新时代爱国主义教育 内容创新 形式创新 时间距离 社会距离 new era patriotism education content innovation form innovation time distance social distance
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献140

  • 1Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Effects of fluency on psychological distance and mental construal. Psychological Science, 19(2), 161-167.
  • 2Armor, D. A., & Sackett, A. M. (2006). Accuracy, error, and bias in predictions for real versus hypothetical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91 (4), 583-600.
  • 3Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(4), 609-622.
  • 4Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Algom, D. (2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136(4), 610-622.
  • 5Bilgin, B., & Brenner, L. (2008). Temporal distance moderates description dependence of subjective probability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44(3), 890-895.
  • 6Day, S. B., & Bartels, D. M. (2004). Temporal distance, event representation, and similarity. Paper presented at the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Chicago, IL.
  • 7Day, S. B., & Bartels, D. M. (2006). Representation across time: Generalizing temporal effects on perceived similarity. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver, Canada.
  • 8Day, S. B., & Barrels, D. M. (2008). Representation over time: The effects of temporal distance on similarity. Cognition, 106, 1504-1513.
  • 9Dhar, R., & Kim, E. Y. (2007). Seeing the forest or the trees:Implications of construal level theory for consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 96-100.
  • 10Eyal, T., Liberman, N., Sagristano, M. D., & Trope, Y. (2006). Resolving value conflicts in planning the future. Unpublished working paper. Department of Psychology, Tel Aviv University.

共引文献272

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部