摘要
文章对与“鲜卑”有关的三处遗存的年代和性质进行了重新检讨。扎赉诺尔M29年代为春秋战国时期,并不是东汉鲜卑墓,墓中出土的辫发不能作为判断墓主是否是鲜卑人的依据。山西右玉善家堡墓地采集的小铜人也不是鲜卑遗物,而属金代。河北万全北沙城遗址H13的年代应该在北魏平城时期,而非辽代。
This paper presents the results of an analysis of the date and nature of archaeological remains that were claimed to be associated with Xianbei at three locations.The author suggests that the tomb no.M29 at Jalainur should be a Spring-and-Autumn/Warring States tomb instead of a Xianbei tomb which dates to the Eastern Han period.Also,the braids found inside the tomb could not be viewed as a piece of evidence that supports the Xianbei identity of the occupant.The bronze figurine from the Shanjiabu cemetery in Youyu should date to the Jin Dynasty,rather than the Xianbei period.Moreover,the date of ash pit no.H13 at Beishacheng in Wanquan should be placed in the Pingcheng era of the Northern Wei,instead of the Liao period.
出处
《考古与文物》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第4期88-92,共5页
Archaeology and Cultural Relics
基金
山西大学云冈学研究院项目经费资助。
关键词
鲜卑
扎赉诺尔
右玉善家堡
万全北沙城
Xianbei
Jalainur
Shanjiabu in Youyu County
Beishacheng in Wanquan