摘要
帕菲特的非同一性问题对未来人伦理学提出了挑战,如何回应这一挑战成了学术界的重要任务。非同一性问题之所以难以解决,主要是它依赖一种比较性的伤害观。依据比较性的伤害观,我们就难以证明当代人伤害了未来人。与此相对,非比较性伤害观可能会提供一种比较好的解决思路。非同一性问题可以分为个体的非同一性问题和集体的非同一性问题,帕菲特即使成功论证了个体的非同一性情境中不存在伤害,但并不能直接推导出集体的非同一性情境不存在伤害。总之,非同一性问题难以否定我们对未来人的伤害及所应承担的责任。
Parfit’s non-identity problem poses a challenge to the ethics of future people, and how to respond to this challenge has become an important task for scholars. Non-identity problem is hard to solve mainly because it relies on a comparative account of harm. However, a non-comparative account of harm may provide a better solution. In addition, non-identity problem can be divided into individual non-identity problem and collective non-identity problem. Even Parfit successfully proved that there is no harm in individual non-identity situation, he could not directly conclude that there is no harm in collective non-identity situation. In short, non-identity problem is difficult to deny the harm we do to future people and the responsibility we should bear.
作者
郭琰
GUO Yan(School of Marxism,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan 430070,China)
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第8期22-27,共6页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“个人同一性研究的当代发展”(18ZDA029)。