期刊文献+

现代公民教育的自然性基础——以爱弥儿作为教育样板 被引量:2

The Natural Basis of Modern Civic Education:Emile as a Model of Education
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现代公民教育的自然性基础是指任何一种形式的公民教育都不能只是单纯依靠社会和学校来完成,而是需要一种非社会性质的自然教育作为前提和准备。这一点在卢梭的《爱弥儿》中体现得极为明显,卢梭认为现代公民教育的本质首先是人的自然权利,然后是人的各种义务和责任。人并不是天然的政治性动物,发生在人身上的公民教育并不是一开始就要让人直接进入社会,而是在这之前需要让人经过一段在社会之外的自然教育。为此,卢梭将爱弥儿视为理想的教育样板,筹划了一个从自然人到公民的完整教育方案,并将公意作为调和爱弥儿身上自然性和社会性的人造纽带,最终将爱弥儿培养成一个在人性发育上充分健全的现代公民。由此,回到和理解人原初的自然性,以一种人性平衡术的方法和眼光来把握人身上自然性和社会性之间的分寸感,是一切形式的现代公民教育都要认真面对和思考的问题。 The natural basis of modern civic education means that any form of civic education can not only rely on society and school, but also needs a kind of antisocial natural education as the premise and preparation. Such point is very obvious in Rousseau’s Emile,because Rousseau believes that the essence of modern civic education lies in the fact that the first thing needed to be considered is the individual’s natural rights, and then to talk about various obligations and responsibilities. Man is not a political animal by nature. The civic education that happens to people is not to let people directly enter the society at the beginning, but needs to go through a period of natural education outside the society before it. Therefore, Rousseau regarded Emile as an ideal model of education, and planned a complete educational program from Natural person to Citizen. He took the General Will as the man-made link to realize the harmony between the naturality and sociality of Emile, and finally cultivated him into a modern citizen who is fully sound in the development of human nature. Thus we should understand the original naturality of human beings and attach great importance to the relationship between naturality and sociality from the perspective of human nature balance. These are the problems that all forms of modern civic education should seriously face and think about.
作者 胡君进 HU Jun-jin(College of Education,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai,200234,China)
出处 《基础教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第3期5-16,共12页 Journal of Schooling Studies
基金 国家社科基金教育学一般课题《教师道德情感的发生机制与培育模式研究》(项目编号:BEA210107)。
关键词 公民教育 自然教育 爱弥儿 自然性 社会性 人性平衡术 civic education natural education Emile naturality sociality a balance of human nature
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献221

  • 1吴玉军.个人自由与社会认同的内在张力——“两个卢梭”问题的新解读[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2004,22(3):227-236. 被引量:3
  • 2李庆钧.霍布斯:理性与社会秩序[J].江海学刊,2004(6):52-56. 被引量:8
  • 3于尔根·厄尔克斯,徐守磊(译).卢梭与“现代教育”意象[J].北京大学教育评论,2006,4(1):46-64. 被引量:16
  • 4Kimball. ( 1995 ). Orators & Philosophers : A History of the Idea of Liberal Education. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
  • 5Aristotle. (1982). Nicomachean Ethics. 1177a-1179a, London: William Henemann.
  • 6Isocrates. (1982). Against the Sophists. Ed. and trans, by George Norlin. Cambridge: Havard University Press, 291-293.
  • 7Augustine. (1995). Against the Academicians and The Teacher. Trans. by Peter King. Hackett, 45.
  • 8李猛.指向事情本身的教育:奥古斯丁的《论教师》[A].教育与现代社会(思想与社会第七辑)[M].上海:三联书店,2009.
  • 9渠敬东.教育中的古与今[A].现代社会中的人性及教育[M].上海:三联书店,2005:3-17.
  • 10[法]涂尔干.教育思想的演进[M].李康译.上海:上海人民出版社,2006:262-281.

共引文献181

同被引文献18

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部