期刊文献+

合作共治:行政犯治理的路径选择 被引量:34

Cooperation and Co-governance:The Path Choice of Criminal Governance Modernization
原文传递
导出
摘要 面对从以自然犯治理为依归,向以行政犯治理为核心的刑事治理对象及其核心领域的深刻变化,唯有立足于中国特色社会主义法律体系中的刑法与其前置部门法的规范关系,秉持“前置法定性与刑事法定量相统一”的犯罪治理理念,重塑行刑衔接的刑事规范体系,再造合作诉讼的刑事程序模式,创新三审合一的刑事审判机制,刑事治理体系才能完成从传统到现代的转型,科学助推国家治理体系的现代化建设。 Confronting a profound change that the object and core area of criminal governance have shifted from setting up for governing natural crimes to centering on administrative crime, the criminal governance system could achieve its transformation from the traditional pattern to a contemporary one by basing on the normative relation between criminal law and the prepositioning laws in the socialistic legal system with Chinese characteristics, adhering to the criminal governance idea of “unifying the criteria that prepositioning laws determine essence of crime and that the criminal law determines degree of crime”, remodeling the normative system of administrative-criminal intersection, remaking a criminal procedure model of cooperative litigation, renewing the criminal judicial system of three-tiered trials unified as one, which, in this way, will scientifically promote the modernization of China’s governance system.
作者 田宏杰 Tian Hongjie
出处 《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第5期155-165,共11页 Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金 2020年最高人民法院司法解释立项课题“办理行政犯罪案件适用法律若干问题的解释”。
关键词 行政犯 行刑衔接 合作诉讼 三审合一 administrative crime administrative-criminal intersection cooperative litigation unifying three-tiered trials
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献61

共引文献896

同被引文献683

引证文献34

二级引证文献104

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部