期刊文献+

基于多中心随机PRECISION试验建立的前列腺癌影像质量控制评分系统解读

Interpretation of imaging quality guideline for prostate cancer from the randomized multicentre PRECISION trial
原文传递
导出
摘要 高质量的多参数MRI(mpMRI)是检出或排除临床显著性前列腺癌的关键决定因素之一。欧洲泌尿生殖放射学会和欧洲泌尿外科学会泌尿影像学分会发布的共识均强调前列腺MRI图像质量评估的重要性。前列腺MRI报告的第一步就是评估图像质量。基于11个国家25个中心的多中心随机PRECISION试验建立的前列腺癌影像质量控制评分系统,旨在促进标准化以减少mpMRI图像质量控制的差异。本文中笔者对该指南的要点进行解读。
作者 王良 陈敏 沈钧康 Li Qiubai 赵心明 宋健 杨正汉 王振常 Wang Liang;Chen Min;Shen Junkang;Li Qiubai;Zhao Xinming;Song Jian;Yang Zhenghan;Wang Zhenchang(Department of Radiology,Beijing Friendship Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100050,China;Department of Radiology,Beijing Hospital,National Center of Gerontology,Beijing 100730,China;Department of Radiology,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University,Suzhou 215004,China;Department of Radiology,University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center,Cleveland 44106,USA;Department of Radiology,National Cancer Center,Cancer Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100021,China;Department of Urology,Beijing Friendship Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100050,China)
出处 《中华放射学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第9期937-940,共4页 Chinese Journal of Radiology
基金 国家自然科学基金(81671656,82071887)。
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献22

  • 1Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2011, 61(2):69-90.DO1:10.3322/ caac.20107.
  • 2Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer[J].N Engl J Med, 2011, 364(18):1708-1717.DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa 1011967.
  • 3Bastian PJ, Carter BH, Bjartell A, et al. Insignificant prostate cancer and active surveillance: from definition to clinical implications[J].Eur Urol, 2009, 55(6): 1321-1330.DOI: 10.1016/ j.eururo.2009.02.028.
  • 4Narain V, Bianco FJ Jr, Grignon DJ, et al. How accurately does prostate biopsy Gleason score predict pathologic findings and disease free survival[J].Prostate, 2001, 49(3):185-190.
  • 5Thrmer G, Otto J, Horn LC, et al. Non-invasive estimation of prostate cancer aggressiveness using diffusion-weighted MRI and 3D proton MR spectroscopy at 3.0 T[J].Acta Radiol, 2015, 56(1):121-128.DOI:10.1177/0284185113520311.
  • 6Donati OF, Mazaheri Y, Afaq A, et al. Prostate cancer aggressiveness: assessment with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient[J].Radiology, 2014, 271 (1): 143-152.DOI: 10.1148/radiol. 13130973.
  • 7Potters L, Roach M 3rd, Davis B J, et al. Postoperative nomogram predicting the 9-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after permanent prostate brachytherapy using radiation dose as a prognostic variable[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2010, 76(4): 1061 - 1065 .DOI: 10.1016/j.ij robp.2009.03.031.
  • 8Bittencourt LK, Barentsz JO, de Miranda LC, et al. Prostate MRI: diffusion-weighted imaging at 1.5T correlates better with prostatectomy Gleason Grades than TRUS-guided biopsies in peripheral zone tumours[J].Eur Radiol, 2012, 22(2):468-475. DOI:10.1007/s00330-011-2269-1.
  • 9Gleason DF, Mellinger GT. Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging[J].J Urol, 1974, 111(1):58-64.
  • 10Somford DM, Hambrock T, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, et al. Initial experience with identifying high-grade prostate cancer using diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) in patients with a Gleason score <3 + 3= 6 upon schematic TRUS-gnided biopsy: a radical prostatectomy correlated series[J].Invest Radiol, 2012, 47(3):153-158. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31823ea 1 f0.

共引文献1493

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部