期刊文献+

类风湿关节炎病人自我护理行为量表的汉化与信效度检验 被引量:1

Chinese version of Self-Care Behaviors Scale among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and its reliability and validity test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对类风湿关节炎病人自我护理行为量表(RA-SCBS)进行汉化,并检验其信效度。方法:对RA-SCBS进行翻译及回译、跨文化调试,形成中文版RA-SCBS,并对四川省某三级甲等医院风湿免疫科住院的234例类风湿关节炎病人进行问卷调查以评价量表信效度。结果:中文版RA-SCBS包括22个条目,其条目内容效度指数均为1,量表水平的内容效度指数为1,探索性因子分析提取4个公因子,累计方差贡献率为59.984%。中文版RA-SCBS得分与慢性病自我管理量表的自我管理子量表得分间的Pearson相关系数为0.693,其Cronbach’sα系数为0.902,重测信度为0.836,折半信度为0.846。结论:中文版RA-SCBS信效度良好,可作为评估我国类风湿关节炎病人自我管理行为水平的工具。 Objective:To Self-Care Behaviors Scale Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis(RA-SCBS)and to test its reliability and validity.Methods:RA-SCBS was translated,retranslated and culturally debugged,and Chinese version of RA-SCBS was formed.Questionnaire survey was conducted among 234 patients with rheumatoid arthritis hospitalized in department of rheumatology and immunology of a tertiary grade A hospitals in Sichuan province to evaluate reliability and validity of the scale.Results:The Chinese version of RA-SCBS included 22 items.The item-level CVI all were 1,and the scale-level CVI was 1.Four common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 59.984%.The Pearson correlation coefficient between score of RA-SCBS and Chronic Disease Self-Management Study Measures was 0.693.The coefficient of Cronbach’sαof Chinese version of RA-SCBS was 0.902,the retest reliability was 0.836,and the half reliability was 0.846.Conclusions:Chinese version of RA-SCBS has good reliability and validity.And it can be used as tool to evaluate self-management behavior of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in China.
作者 陈婧琳 程一帆 陈红 CHEN Jinglin;CHENG Yifan;CHEN Hong(West China School of Nursing,Sichuan University/West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Sichuan 610064 China)
出处 《护理研究》 北大核心 2022年第18期3209-3215,共7页 Chinese Nursing Research
基金 四川大学华西护理学科发展专项基金项目,编号:HXHL20009。
关键词 类风湿关节炎 自我管理 信度 效度 汉化 护理 rheumatoid arthritis self-management reliability validity sinicization nursing
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献133

  • 1朱莉珍,吴克明,岑洲,丁永明,傅华,傅东波.社区糖尿病自我管理项目干预效果评价[J].上海预防医学,2005,17(10):506-506. 被引量:12
  • 2马冠生,孔灵芝,栾德春,李艳平,胡小琪,王京钟,杨晓光.中国居民吸烟行为的现状分析[J].中国慢性病预防与控制,2005,13(5):195-199. 被引量:250
  • 3Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.
  • 4Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135.
  • 5Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575.
  • 6Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22.
  • 7Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293.
  • 8Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385.
  • 9Davis LL.Instrument review:Getting the most from your panel ofexperts[J].Appl Nurs Res,1992,5(4):194–197.
  • 10Polit DF,Beck CT.The content validity index:are you sure youknow what’s being reported?critique and recommendations[J].Res Nurs Health,2006,29(5):489–497.

共引文献2552

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部