期刊文献+

数字乳腺断层摄影(DBT)与全数字化乳腺摄影(FFDM)对乳腺病变诊断效能的对比 被引量:5

Comparions of the Diagnostic Value between Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-field Digital Mammography
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究数字乳腺断层摄影(digital breast tomosynthesis,DBT)对于乳腺病变诊断的效能。方法选取2017年9月至2019年9月在昆明市延安医院就诊的乳腺疾病患者151例,患者全部进行CC位及MLO位DBT和全数字化乳腺摄影(Full-field Digital Mammography,FFDM)拍摄。结果DBT诊断乳腺良、恶性病变的特异性、敏感性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性均明显高于FFDM,而敏感性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性稍低于FFDM+DBT,差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.05);对于肿块病灶,DBT诊断乳腺病变的特异性、敏感性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性均高于单独FFDM,差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.05),DBT与DBT+FFDM诊断效能相当;对于致密型腺体内病灶,DBT诊断乳腺病变的特异性、敏感性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性均明显高于单独FFDM,差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.05),DBT诊断乳腺病变的敏感性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性低于DBT+FFDM,差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。结论对比单独FFDM,DBT+FFDM及单独DBT均明显提高了乳腺疾病诊断的准确性,尤其对于致密型乳腺;FFDM+DBT较DBT略有优势。 Objective To investigate the diagnosistic efficiency of digital breast tomosynthesis(DBT)in breast diseases.Methods 151 women with a clinically suspicious breast disease during Sept.2017 to Sept.2019were enrolled into the study and all of them received full-field digital mammography(FFDM)and DBT examinations in Yan’an Hospital of Kunming.Results The specificity,sensitivity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value and accuracy of DBT in diagnosing benign and malignant breast lesions were significantly higher than those of FFDM,while the sensitivity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value and accuracy were slightly lower than those of FFDM+DBT(P<0.05);The specificity,sensitivity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value and accuracy of DBT in diagnosing breast lesions were higher than those of FFDM alone(P<0.05).The diagnostic efficacy of DBT and DBT+FFDM was comparable;For dense intraglandular lesions,the specificity,sensitivity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value and accuracy of DBT in diagnosing breast lesions were significantly higher than those of FFDM alone(P<0.05).The sensitivity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value and accuracy of DBT in diagnosing breast lesions were lower than those of DBT+FFDM(P<0.05)Conclusion As compared with FFDM,DBT+FFDM and DBT significantly can improve the accuracy of breast disease diagnosis,especially for dense breast;FFDM+DBT has some advantages over DBT.
作者 李霞 王晋 LI Xia;WANG Jin(Dept.of Radiology,Yan’an Hospital,Kunming Yunnan 655800,China)
出处 《昆明医科大学学报》 CAS 2022年第9期118-124,共7页 Journal of Kunming Medical University
基金 昆明市延安医院院内基金资助项目(yyky017-020)。
关键词 数字乳腺断层 全数字化乳腺摄影 乳腺病变 敏感性 特异性 Digital breast tomosynthesis Full-field digital mammography Breast diseas Sensitivity Specificit
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献174

  • 1马捷,徐坚民,孙国平,左敏,王晓玫,王国红,臧达,杨忠,彭东红,周冬仙,麦佩成.乳腺结构扭曲征象的X线分析[J].中国医学影像技术,2007,23(4):527-531. 被引量:13
  • 2赵永霞,秦维昌.数字乳腺X线摄影的现状与进展[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(12):1421-1424. 被引量:21
  • 3Skaane P, Young K, Skjennald A, et al. Population-based mam- mography screening : comparison of screen-film and full-filed digital mammography with soft-copy Oslo 1 study [ J ]. Radiology, 2003, 229 ( 3 ) :877-833.
  • 4Gong X, Glick SJ, Liu B, et al. A computer simulation study com- paring lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography , breast tomosynthesis,and cone-beam CT breast imagingl J]. Medical Phys- ics, 2006, 33(4) :1041-1052.
  • 5Park A M, Franken EA, Garg M, et al. Breast tomosynthesis: Pres- ent considerations and Future applications [ J ]. Riadiographics, 2007 (27) :231-240.
  • 6Good WF, Abrams GS, Catullo VJ, et al. Digital breast Tomosyn- thesis :A Pilot Observer Study[J]. AJR,2008(190) :865-869.
  • 7Rafferty E, Niklason L, Halpern E,et al. Assessing radiologist per- fonnance using combined full-filed digital mammogTaphy and breast tomosynthesis versus full-filed digital mammography alone: results of a multi-center multi-reader trial[ J]. Radiological Society of North American annualmeeting,2007,45(5) :831-843.
  • 8Baker JA, LO JY. Breast Tomosynthesis : state-of-the-art and re- view of the literature [ J ]. Academic Radiology, 2011,18 ( 10 ) : 1298-1301.
  • 9Rafferty EA, Niklason L. FFDM versus FFDM with tomosynthesisfor women with radiographically dense breasts : an enriched retro- spective reader study [ J ]. Radiolographieally Society of North Amer- ica annual meeting . LNCS 5116:61-66.
  • 10Gur D, Bandos AI, Rockette HE, et al. Is an ROC-type response truly always better than a binary response in observer performance studies[ J]. Acad Radiol,2010, 17 (5) :639-654. .

共引文献561

同被引文献47

引证文献5

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部