选择合并之诉的辨析与审理

Analysis and trial of the litigation of selective merger

选择合并之诉是客观合并之诉的一种类型。由于德国学者和日本学者对选择合并之诉理解上的差异,形成了旧选择合并之诉说与新选择合并之诉说两种学说。比较分析新旧两种选择合并之诉说并解读特殊情况下的选择合并之诉,可以发现新选择合并之诉说主张由法院进行选择裁判,更符合选择合并之诉的本意。总结选择合并之诉一审、二审审理与裁判的不同情形,探讨选择合并之诉的发展进路,对该理论在司法实践中的具体应用大有裨益。

The litigation of selective merger is a type of the litigation of objective merger.Due to the different understandings of German scholars and Japanese scholars on the litigation of selective merger,two theories have been formed,the old one and the new one.Comparing and analyzing the old and new litigation of selective merger and interpreting the litigation of selective merger under special circumstances,it can be found that the new litigation of selective merger is that the court decides by choice,which is more in line with the original intention of the litigation of selective merger.Summarizing the different situations of the first-instance trial,second-instance trial and adjudication in the litigation of selective merger,and discussing the development approach of the litigation of selective merger,it is of great benefit to the specific application of this theory in judicial practice.