期刊文献+

基于聚合单值中智集的多属性决策新方法及其应用 被引量:1

A New Multi-attribute Decision Making Method Based on Aggregation Single-valued Neutrosophic Sets and Its Application
原文传递
导出
摘要 多属性决策是指在已有的决策信息下对备选方案进行排序或者择优,它在能源、政治、环境和商业等领域有着广泛的应用。但在实际的应用中,由于许多对象存在属性信息的不准确性或不确定性,针对这种情况,提出了一种基于聚合单值中智集的多属性决策新模型。首先,通过决策专家评价得到了决策矩阵,给出了单值中智集的得分函数,进而得到了正理想方案和负理想方案。其次,利用TOPSIS法对所有备选方案进行排序,确定最优的决策方案。最后,通过软件评估算例和对比分析说明了该方法的有效性和合理性。 Multi-attribute decision-making(MADM)refers to ranking or selecting the best alternatives based on the existing decision information.It is widely used in energy,politics,environment and business.But in practical application,because many objects have inaccuracy or uncertainty of attribute information,in order to solve this problem,a new MADM model based on single-valued neutrosophic sets aggregation is proposed.Firstly,the decision matrix is obtained through the evaluation of decision experts,and the score function of single-valued neutrosophic sets(SVNSs)is given,so the positive ideal solution and the negative ideal solution are getted.Secondly,TOPSIS method is used to sort all the alternatives and determine the optimal decision scheme.Finally,an example of software evaluation and comparative analysis are given to illustrate the effectiveness and rationality of the method.
作者 叶万红 耿娟娟 徐东胜 YE Wan-hong;GENG Juan-juan;XU Dong-sheng(Foundation Department,Sichuan Institute of Industrial Technology,Deyang 618500,China;School of Science,Southwest Petroleum University,Chengdu 610500,China)
出处 《模糊系统与数学》 北大核心 2022年第4期124-130,共7页 Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics
基金 教育部人文社会科学项目(17YJA630115)。
关键词 单值中智集 TOPSIS 决策矩阵 多属性决策 软件评估 Single-valued Neutrosophic Set TOPSIS Decision Matrix MADM Software Evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1徐泽水,陈剑.一种基于区间直觉判断矩阵的群决策方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007,27(4):126-133. 被引量:140
  • 2KRISHNAN V, ULRICH K T. Product development deci sions:a review of the literature [J]. Management Science, 2001,47(1) :1-21.
  • 3乌尔里克,埃平格.产品设计与开发[M].3版.北京:高等教育出版社,2005.
  • 4VERMA D, MISHRA A, SINHA K K. The development and application of a process model for R&D project management in a high tech firm: A field study[J]. Journal of Operations Man- agement,2011,29(5) :462- 476.
  • 5CARBONELL-FOULQUIE P, MUNUERA-ALEMAN J L, RODRIGUEZ-ESCUDERO A I. Criteria employed for go/no- go decisions when developing successful highly innovative products[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2004,33 (4):307- 316.
  • 6TAMADA Y, TSAI T S. Delegating the decision-making au- thority to terminate a sequential project[J]. Journal of Eco- nomic Behavior & Organization,2014,99: 178-194. DOI: 10. 1016/i. jebo. 2014.01. 007.
  • 7KAHNEMAN D, TVERSKY A. Prospeetan analysis of de- cision under risk[J]. Econometrica, 1979,47(2) : 263-292.
  • 8LAHDELMA R, SALMINEN P. Prospect theory and sto- chastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis[J]. Omega,2009,37(5) :961-971.
  • 9TVERSKY A, KAHNEMAN D. Advances in prospect theo- ry:cumulative representation of uncertainty[J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,1992,5(4) :297-323.
  • 10YAGER R P, KACPRZYK J. On ordered weighted avera- ging aggregation operators: theory and applications [M]. Norwell, Ma. , USA: Kluwer, 1997.

共引文献34

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部