摘要
目的:分析山东省现阶段中医药政策工具的选择和使用情况,为后续制定与完善山东省中医药政策提供参考。方法:采用内容分析法,通过设计分析框架、划定分析模块、制定条目编码分类以及频数统计,基于政策工具(强制型、自愿型、混合型)视角,对选取的35份山东省中医药政策文件进行编码分类和统计分析。结果:3种类型的政策工具中,混合型政策工具应用最多,占比达59.35%;其次是强制型政策工具,占30.97%;自愿型政策工具数量最少,仅占9.68%。结论:山东省中医药政策偏好混合型和强制型,自愿型采用较少。应在坚持政府主导的基础上,综合运用3种类型的政策工具,优化强制型政策工具,加强混合型政策工具的协调发展,增加自愿型政策工具的应用比例。
OBJECTIVE To analyze the selection and use of policy tools of TCM policy in Shandong province,and to provide reference for formulating and improving TCM policy in Shandong province.METHODS Based on the policy tools(mandatory,voluntary and mixed),35 selected TCM policy documents of Shandong province were coded,classified and statistically analyzed by content analysis method through the design of analysis framework,delineation of analysis modules,item coding classification and frequency statistics.RESULTS Among the three types of policy tools,mixed policy tools were the most widely used,accounting for 59.35%.The second was mandatory policy tools,accounting for 30.97%.The number of voluntary policy tools was the least,accounting for only9.68%.CONCLUSION The TCM policy preference in Shandong province is mixed and compulsory,and voluntary tools are seldom used.On the basis of adhering to the government’s leadership,it should use three types of policy tools comprehensively,optimize the compulsory policy tools,strengthen the coordinated development of the mixed policy tools,and increase the application proportion of the voluntary policy tools.
作者
张静
李友卫
ZHANG Jing;LI You-wei(School of Public Health and Management,Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou,Guangdong,510006,China;不详)
出处
《中国初级卫生保健》
2022年第9期15-19,共5页
Chinese Primary Health Care
基金
山东省2021年中医药科技项目(2021Z001)。
关键词
政策工具
中医药政策
文本分析
山东
policy tools
traditional chinese medicine policy
text analysis
Shandong