期刊文献+

社会住宅社区营造的经验与启示——以台北市“社会住宅青年创新回馈计划”为例

The Experience and Inspiration of Community Building in Social Housing:A Case Study of"Taipei Social Housing for Youth Innovation"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 社会住宅因其社会福利属性带来的弱势群体聚居现象,常引发周边邻里的排斥而被标签化。为避免社会排斥,除了提升社会住宅的硬件条件外,还可采取混合居住模式,但居民的多元异质却造成社区融合的不易。针对这些问题,台北市“社会住宅青年创新回馈计划”在社会住宅中开展针对性的社区营造活动,成效显著。从该计划的参与主体、运行机制、营造策略、现有成效及呈现问题等多个角度进行解析,研究其推动社区营造的过程,总结出弹性政策与制度创新、多元主体的协同合作、灵活多样的互动机制和互惠共享的价值导向等4方面的实践经验,以期为大陆的混合居住社区推动社区营造提供借鉴。 Social housing is often labeled due to its social welfare attributes that bring about the phenomenon of clustering of disadvantaged groups,which often triggers isolation by neighboring residents.In order to avoid social exclusion,apart from improving the hardware conditions of social housing,mixed-income housing models can be adopted,but the heterogeneity of residents’identities and incomes makes community integration difficult.In response to these problems,"Taipei Social Housing for Youth Innovation"has carried out targeted community building activities in social housing with remarkable results.We analyze the program from various perspectives,such as the participating parties,operation mechanism,creation strategy,current effectiveness and problems,study the process of promoting community building,and conclude four practical experiences,such as flexible policy and institutional innovation,collaborative cooperation of multiple parties,flexible and diverse interaction mechanism,and value orientation of mutual benefit and sharing,in order to provide a reference for promoting community building in mixed-income communities in China's Mainland.
作者 王峥 WANG Zheng
出处 《上海城市规划》 北大核心 2022年第4期25-31,共7页 Shanghai Urban Planning Review
关键词 社会住宅 混合居住 社区营造 青年创新回馈计划 台北 social housing mixed-income community community building Taipei Social Housing for Youth Innovation Taipei
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献72

  • 1萧新煌 刘华真.台湾的土地住宅问题与无住屋者运动的限制.香港社会科学学报,1993,(2):1-20.
  • 2曾旭正.台湾的社区营造[M].台北:远足文化,2007.
  • 3La Grange A, Chang C-O, Yip N M. Commodification and Urban Development: A Case Study of Taiwan[J]. Housing Studies, 2006, 21(1): 53-76.
  • 4Chen Y L, Li W. Neo-liberalism, The Developmental State and Housing Policy in Taiwan[M] //B G Park, A Saito, R Hill, eds. Locating Neoliberalism in East Asia: Neoliberalizing Spaces in Developmental States. Oxford: Wiley-Blaekwell, 2011:196-224.
  • 5Lee J, Forrest R, Tam W K. Home-ownership in East and South East Asia: Market, State and Institutions[M] // Forrcst R, Lee J. (eds.) Housing and Social Change: East-West Perspcctivas. London & New York: Routledge, 2003: 20-45.
  • 6“行政院主计处”.2010年人口及住宅普查初步统计结果提要分析[EB/OL].(2011)[2012-11-01].http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xltem=30077&ctNode=3272.
  • 7社会住宅联盟.台湾“社会住宅”说帖[EB/OL].(2010-10-04)[2012-11-01].http://socialhousingtw.blogspot.corn/2010/10/blog-post_04.hUnl.
  • 8“国土规划及不动产信息中心”.2004-2011住宅需求调查,“内政部营建暑”[EB/OL].[2012-11-01].http://www.ippi.org.tw/.
  • 9Chen Y L. Provision for Collective Consumption: Housing Production Under Neoliberalism[M] //Kwok R Y W, ed. Globalizing Taipei: The Political Economy of Spatial Development. London & New York: Routledge, 2005: 99-119.
  • 10Speare A Jr., Liu P K C, Tsay C L. Urbanization and Development: The Rural-UrbanTransition in Taiwan, Boulder[M]. USA & London, UK: Westview Press, 1988.

共引文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部