期刊文献+

时间平方根法评价隔离墙t50及固结系数

Evaluation of the t50 Value and Coefficient of Consolidation of Cutoff Wall Based on Square Root of Time Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在孔压静力触探测试过程中,常出现孔隙水压力在消散过程中先增加再减小的现象,这种现象被称为非标准消散类型。而在非标准消散类型中,常采用传统标准消散类型分析方法,通过初始孔压得出t值及固结系数,这种方法因忽略孔压上升段故而存在一定的误差。基于此,对初始孔压进行修正至关重要。采用时间平方根法对初始孔压进行修正,继而评价t值及固结系数。同时,对于试验现场消散时间小于t的情况,通过时间平方根法预测t值,进而评价此处的固结系数,从而节约现场测试时间。最后,将时间平方根法与时间对数法及修正t法进行对比。研究表明,时间平方根法与时间对数法得出的固结系数比较接近,修正t法得出的固结系数较前两种方法更大。 In the process of piezocone penetration test,pore pressure often increases first and then decreases during the dissipation process.This phenomenon is called non-standard dissipation type.However,in the non-standard dissipation type,the traditional standard dissipation type analysis method is often adopted.By using the initial pore pressure,the tvalue and coefficient of consolidation are obtained.This method has some errors because it ignores the rising section of pore water pressure.Based on this,it is very important to correct the initial pore pressure.the initial pore pressure is corrected by the square root of time method,and then the tvalue and the coefficient of consolidation are evaluated.At the same time,for the case where the dissipation time at the test site is less than t,the tvalue is predicted by the square root of time method,and the coefficient of consolidation is evaluated so as to save on-site test time.Finally,this paper compares the square root of time method with the logarithmic of time method and the modified tmethod.The research shows that the coefficient of consolidation obtained by time square root method is close to that obtained by time logarithm method,and the coefficient of consolidation obtained by the modified tmethod is larger than that obtained by the previous two methods.
作者 李学鹏 李彩华 陈荣保 蔡国军 LI Xuepeng;LI Caihua;CHEN Rongbao;CAI Guojun(、Chancheng District Construction Engineering Quality and Safety Inspection Station of Foshan Foshan 528000,China;、Institute of Geotechnical Engineering,Southeast University Nanjing 210096,China)
出处 《广东土木与建筑》 2022年第9期13-16,共4页 Guangdong Architecture Civil Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金(41877231)。
关键词 时间平方根法 t50值 修正后的初始孔压 固结系数 隔离墙 square root of time method t50 the corrected initial pore pressure coefficient of consolidation cutoff wall
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献30

  • 1刘松玉,吴燕开.论我国静力触探技术 (CPT)现状与发展[J].岩土工程学报,2004,26(4):553-556. 被引量:144
  • 2蔡国军,刘松玉,童立元,杜广印.孔压静力触探(CPTU)测试成果影响因素及原始数据修正方法探讨[J].工程地质学报,2006,14(5):632-636. 被引量:15
  • 3CAI G J, LIU S Y, TONG LY, et al. Assessment of direct CPT and CPTU methods for predicting the ultimate bearing capacity of single piles[J]. Engineering Geology, 2009, 103(3): 211 - 222
  • 4L1U S Y, CAI G J, TONG L Y, et al. Approach on the engineering properties of Lianyungang marine clay from piezocone penetration tests[J]. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 2008, 26(7): 189- 210.
  • 5LUNNE T, ROBERTSON P K, POWELL J J M. Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice[M]. London: Blackie Academic and Professional, 1997:45 - 50
  • 6CHUNG S F, MARK F R, SCHNEIDER J A. Effect of penetration rate on penetrometer resistance in clay[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2006, 132(9): 1 188- 1 196
  • 7ISSMGE. International reference test procedure(IRTP) for the cone penetration test(CPT) and the cone penetration test with pore pressure (CPTU)[C]//Proceedings of the XIIth ECSMGE. Amsterdam: [s. n.] 1999: 2195-2222.
  • 8TONG L Y, LIU S Y, DUG Y, et al. Current status of the cone penetration test in China and its future development[C]//Proceedings of Sessions of GeoShanghai 2006. Shanghai: [s. n.], 2006:220 229.
  • 9湖北省水利水电勘测设计院.静力触探三种不同锥底面积探头对比试验报告[R].武汉:湖北省水利水电勘测设计院,1975.
  • 10ROBERTSON P K, CAMPANELLA R G. Guidelines ofgeotechnical design using CPT and CPTU[R]. Columbia: University of British Columbia, 1988.

共引文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部