跨大西洋气候政治分歧:表征、动因与前景

Transatlantic Climate Political Divergence:Representations,Causes and Prospects

在并不久远的全球气候政治史上,美欧角色及其影响总能引发广泛讨论,但双方仍存在明显分歧。美欧对全球治理角色定位存在认知偏差,不同的经济模式和政治体制差异,导致二者在非传统安全议程中的利益分歧大于合作意愿,因此双方在气候变化治理目标、方式、行动等方面分歧明显,这将影响和制约跨大西洋关系重新趋近的程度和全球气候治理体系变革。美欧存在一定的气候合作空间,延续跨大西洋气候行动。跨大西洋气候政治发展前景在于强化《巴黎协定》目标共识,扩大清洁能源技术部署,推进绿色技术开发和创新,提振全球气候治理雄心。

In the short history of global climate politics, the role and impact of the United States and Europe have always been widely discussed, but there are still obvious divergences between the two sides.The United States and Europe have cognitive biases in their positioning of the role of global governance, and differences in economic models and political systems contribute to the fact that their interests divergence outweighs their willingness to cooperate in the non-traditional security agenda.Therefore, the two sides have obvious differences in the goals, methods and actions of climate change governance, which will affect and restrict the degree of re-convergence of transatlantic relations and the reform of the global climate governance system.Meanwhile, the United States and Europe have a certain space for climate cooperation to continue the transatlantic climate action, the prospects of which lie in strengthening the consensus on the objectives of the Paris Agreement, expanding the deployment of clean energy technologies, promoting the development and innovation of green technologies, and boosting the ambition of global climate governance.