期刊文献+

基于不同评估方法的高速动车组车体结构气动疲劳性能研究 被引量:2

Research on Aerodynamic Fatigue Performance of High-Speed EMU Carbody Structure based on Different Evaluation Methods
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于IIW-2008和EN1999-1-3标准中名义应力法及ASME-2007标准中结构应力法,研究高速动车组铝合金车体焊接结构的气动疲劳问题.总结接头名义应力与结构应力的选取位置及计算过程,明确各疲劳评估方法的分析步骤,并对两种焊接工艺的铝合金对接接头进行疲劳分析,结果表明:无垫板的疲劳寿命次数高于带垫板的,基于EN1999-1-3标准的无垫板的疲劳寿命次数约为带垫板的1.68倍;在GB/T 32059-2015中的气动疲劳载荷作用下,采用名义应力法和结构应力法对某高速动车组铝合金车体焊接结构进行疲劳分析,累积损伤值较大的部位为司机室侧墙、车顶焊缝等区域.IIW-2008和EN1999-1-3标准中接头FAT等级相同的接头S-N曲线不一致,导致具有相同的名义应力的接头累积损伤不同.通过对司机室大侧窗下的三种结构设计方案的关键焊缝的结构应力分析获得其最终设计方案.基于结构应力法的司机室侧窗角焊缝与司机室立柱与地板角焊缝的累积损伤分别为0.736和0.658,低于名义应力法的计算结果.建议高速动车组车体气动疲劳设计时应重点考察铝合金司机室的焊接结构. Using the nominal stress method in the IIW-2008 and EN1999-1-3 standards and the structural stress method in the ASME-2007 standard,the aerodynamic fatigue problem of the welded structure of an aluminum alloy car body of the high-speed EMU is studied.The selection location and calculation process of the nominal stress and structural stress of the joint are summarized,the analysis steps of each fatigue assessment method are clarified,and the fatigue analysis of the aluminum alloy butt joint with two welding processes are conducted.The result shows that the number of fatigue life of the non-backed plate is higher than that of the backed plate,and the fatigue life of the non-backed plate based on the EN1999-1-3 standard is about 1.68 times that of the backed plate.Under the aerodynamic fatigue load in GB/T 32059-2015,the nominal stress method and the structural stress method are used to perform fatigue analysis on the welded structure of the aluminum alloy car body of a high-speed EMU.The parts with the larger cumulative damage value are the side wall of the cab,car roof welds and other areas.As the S-N curves of joints with the same FAT grade in the IIW-2008 and EN1999-1-3 standards are inconsistent,the cumulative damage of joints with the same nominal stress is different.Through the structural stress analysis of the key welds of three structural design schemes under the large side window of the cab,the final design scheme is obtained.Based on the structural stress method,the cumulative damages of the fillet welds of the side window of the cab and the fillet welds of the column and the floor of the cab are 0.736 and 0.658 respectively,which are lower than the results calculated by the nominal stress method.The results suggest that the welding structure of the aluminum alloy driver cab should be emphasized in the aerodynamic fatigue design of the high-speed EMU carbody.
作者 谢素明 王家兴 程亚军 聂春戈 XIE Suming;WANG Jiaxing;CHENG Yajun;NIE Chunge(School of Locomotive and Rolling Stock Engineering,Dalian Jiaotong University,Dalian 116028,China;CRRC Changchun Railway Passenger Vehicle Co.,Ltd,Changchun 130062,China)
出处 《大连交通大学学报》 CAS 2022年第4期32-37,共6页 Journal of Dalian Jiaotong University
基金 国家高速列车技术创新中心研发计划资助项目(CXKY-02-01-01(2020))。
关键词 高速动车组 气动疲劳 焊接接头 名义应力 结构应力 high-speed EMU aerodynamic fatigue welded joints nominal stress structural stress
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献25

  • 1王英学,高波,赵文成,骆建军.高速列车进出隧道空气动力学特征模型实验分析[J].流体力学实验与测量,2004,18(3):73-78. 被引量:19
  • 2卢耀辉,曾京,邬平波.铁路客车车体轻量化问题的研究[J].机械强度,2005,27(1):99-103. 被引量:22
  • 3梅元贵,赵海恒,刘应清.高速铁路隧道压力波数值分析[J].西南交通大学学报,1995,30(6):667-672. 被引量:40
  • 4王福军.计算流体动力学分析[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2004.126-131,147-148.
  • 5Gl(O)ckle H.Determining Comfort Limits with Regard to Preesure Changes and Operational Experiences with Pressure-tight Vehicles[C] //The 8th International Conference on Aerodynamics and Ventilation of Vehicle Tunnels,1994:95-101.
  • 6GAWTHORPE R G.Pressure Comfort Criteria for Rail Tunnel Operations[C] //The 7th International Symposium on the Aerodynamics and Ventilation of Vehicle Tunnels,1991:171-188.
  • 7GAWTHORPE R G,FIGURA G I,ROBERTSON N.Pressure Chamber Tests of Passenger Comfort in Tunnels[C] //The 8th International Conference on Aerodynamics and Ventilation of Vehicle Tunnels,1994:27-243.
  • 8铃木浩明,等.车内压力波动に起因する乘客の不快感に関する研究の动向[R].铁道总研报告,1996,10(10):41-45.
  • 9饭田雅宣,前田达夫.トネソル内压力波动シミユレ一シヨン[R].铁道总研报告,1996,14(7):4-62.
  • 10KRAJNOVIC S.Optimization of Aerodynamic Properties of High-speed Trains with CFD and Response Surface Models[J].The Aerodynamics of Heavy Vehicles Ⅱ:Trucks,Buses,and Trains,2009,41:197-211.

共引文献9

同被引文献20

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部