期刊文献+

页岩气层关键参数评价及射孔压裂优化选层 被引量:2

Evaluation on Key Parameters and Optimization Selection of Target Perforating and Fracturing Layer of Shale Gas Reservoir
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对四川盆地海相页岩气藏,以岩心分析为基础,综合利用钻井、测井、录井、地质、试气、岩心等资料,构建有机碳含量(TOC)、孔隙度(POR)、含气量(GAS)、脆性指数(BI)、破裂压力(PF)等页岩气层关键参数评价模型,依次优先考虑TOC、POR、GAS和BI四参数,分区块建立了页岩气测井解释标准,提出了页岩水平井射孔-压裂优选层原则。在四川盆地两个国家页岩气示范区应用30口井,页岩气层关键参数相对误差最大为7.6%,页岩气层测井识别正确率达95.0%,有力驱动了我国南方页岩气的勘探开发。 The work is carried out in marine sedimentary shale gas reservoirs in Sichuan Basin.Based on core analysis,comprehensively combining with drilling,logging,geology,gas testing and core data,an evaluation model which takes organic carbon content(TOC),porosity(POR),gas content(GAS),brittleness index(BI),fracture pressure(PF)as key parameters of shale gas reservoirs is established.This paper preferentially takes TOC,POR,GAS and BI as parameters,establishing different log interpretation standards in different blocks,suggesting some principles of optimizing preferred perforating and fracturing layers of horizontal wells in shale gas reservoir.The model is applied in thirty wells of two national shale gas demonstration zones in Sichuan Basin.The results turned out that the maximum relative error of shale gas reservoir′s key parameters is 7.6%and the accuracy of shale gas reservoir logging identification is 95.0%.This suggests the model strongly promotes the exploration and development of shale gas in southern China.
作者 赵俊峰 ZHAO Junfeng(Matrix Corporation,SINOPEC,Qingdao,Shandong 266000,China)
出处 《海洋石油》 CAS 2022年第3期54-61,共8页 Offshore Oil
关键词 页岩气 测井 关键参数 解释标准 优化选层 shale gas logging key parameters interpretation standard optimized layer selection
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献108

  • 1黄茜,刘菁华,王祝文.自然伽马能谱测井资料在确定粘土矿物含量中的应用[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2007,37(S1):143-146. 被引量:18
  • 2张金川,金之钧,袁明生.页岩气成藏机理和分布[J].天然气工业,2004,24(7):15-18. 被引量:1225
  • 3闫萍,孙建孟,苏远大,李召成,成荣红,王焕增.利用测井资料计算新疆迪那气田地应力[J].新疆石油地质,2006,27(5):611-614. 被引量:19
  • 4Russell W Spears, David Dudus, Andrew Foulds, et al. Shale Gas Core Analysis: Strategies for Normali- zing Between Laboratories and a Clear Need for Stand- ard Materials [C]// SPWLA 52nd Annual Logging Symposium Transactions, A, Colorado: 2011.
  • 5Charlers Boyer, John Kieschnick Roberto, Suarez-Rivera Richard E, et al.页岩气藏的开采[J].油田新技术,2006年秋季刊:18-31.
  • 6Darrell L. Eubanks. Application of Resistivity Borehole Image Analysis in Unconventional Gas Reservoir Field Development [C]// SPWLA 49th Annual Logging Symposium Transactions, XX, Edinburgh: 2008.
  • 7Dan Buller, Suparman FNU, Shan Kwong. A Novel Approach to Shale-gas Evaluation Using a Cased-hole Pulsed Neutron Tool[C]// SPWLA 51st Annual Logging Symposium Transactions, IIII, Perth.. 2010.
  • 8Mark A Miller, Creties Jenkins et al. Applying Innovative Production Modeling Techniques to QuantifyFracture Characteristics, Reservoir Properties, and Well Performance in Shale Gas Reservoirs[C]//SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, 2010 (10), Morgantown, West Virginia, USA: 12-14.
  • 9Paul Boonen, Zhipeng Liu, Libai Xu, et al. Application of Triple Neutron Porosity Measurements in Gas Shales and Shaly Sands [C] // SPWLA 51st Annual Logging Symposium Transactions, JJJJ, Perth: 2010.
  • 10Hamed Soroush, Vamegh Rasouli, Behzad Tokhmechi. A Data Processing Algorithm Proposed for Identi- fication of Breakout Zones in TightforMations: A case Study in Barnett Gas Shale[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2010(74) : 154-162.

共引文献100

同被引文献24

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部