摘要
将写作前测成绩水平相当的两个班级定为实验组(45人)和对照组(48人)。前者采取移动辅助语言学习(MALL)进行英语写作训练,学生据批改网和教师意见在线多次修改写作,后者采用纸质作文写作、教师批阅、教师反馈的传统方式。较之对照组,实验组作文后测成绩显著提高。在访谈时学生亦肯定MALL的有效性。
Two classes with the same level of pre-writing test scores were set as experimental class(45 students)and control class(48 students).The former adopted mobile language writing:students modify their writings online many times based on the feedbacks of Pigai network and teachers.The latter employed the conventional way:paper writing,teacher revision and teacher feedback.The experimental class made more significant progress than control class in the post-test.The effectiveness of mobile language writing was also recognized by the students interviewed after the experiment.
作者
林馥嫌
阴小蓓
Lin Fuxian;Yin Xiaobei(School of Arts and Sciences,Fujian Medial University,Fuzhou 350122,Fujian,China)
出处
《中国高等医学教育》
2022年第7期45-46,49,共3页
China Higher Medical Education
基金
福建省教育厅中青年项目(项目编号:JAS170182)。