职务犯罪案件监检衔接问题的思考——以最高人民检察院第二十批指导性案例为例

Reflections on the Cohesive Mechanism of Supervision Committee and Procuratorial Organs of Duty Crime——Taking the 20th Guiding Cases of the Supreme People’s Procuratorate as Example

作为监检衔接的重要一环,检察机关提前介入监察调查程序常见于监察实践,并成为提升反腐质效、破除程序障碍的重要举措。该工作机制虽为监察实践所接受,但理论层面还存在一些争议。而最高人民检察院发布的第二十批指导性案例正是着眼于监察与刑事司法在审查起诉环节的程序衔接问题,探索了检察机关提前介入监察调查程序和监检办案程序中审查起诉工作的实践,为破除“两法衔接”中的程序性障碍提供了借鉴。

As an important part of the cohesive mechanism of supervision committee and procuratorial organs after the reform of supervision system,the intervention of procuratorial organ in supervisory investigation has become a common measure and an important way to improve the quality and efficiency of anti-corruption and remove procedural obstacles.Although this mechanism has been accepted by the supervision practice,there are still some disputes at the theoretical level.The 20th guiding cases of the Supreme People’s Procuratorate focus on the cohesive mechanism of supervision committee and procuratorial organs,especially on prosecution,which explores the practice of the cohesive mechanism of supervision committee and procuratorial organs and provide some reference for breaking down some procedural obstacles in the convergence of supervision law and criminal procedural law.