期刊文献+

胃癌腹腔镜规范化手术治疗模式在上海部分区域医疗中心推广效能的初步分析

Preliminary analysis of the promotion effect of laparoscopic standardized surgical treatment for gastric cancer in regional medical centers in Shanghai
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的初步探讨胃癌腹腔镜规范化手术治疗模式在上海部分区域医疗中心培训推广的效能。方法采用回顾性队列研究的方法。自2020年1月开始,由上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院暨上海市微创外科临床医学中心牵头、对上海市11家区域医疗中心开展为期1年的胃癌腹腔镜规范化手术治疗先进技术培训推广,收集培训推广计划前后的手术患者病例资料。纳入标准为术中行腹腔镜下远端胃或全胃切除术、并经病理证实为胃癌、且肿瘤无远处转移或腹膜转移的患者;排除未施行腹腔镜D2根治切除、术前接受新辅助化疗和临床病例资料不完整者。2019年1—12月为规范化技术推广前,此期间接受腹腔镜手术的胃癌患者作为推广前组(46例);2021年1—12月期间接受腹腔镜手术的胃癌患者作为推广后组(102例);另外选取上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院2021年1—12月期间接受腹腔镜手术治疗的胃癌患者作为对照组(138例),分析3组患者的临床资料和手术相关指标以及术后并发症的发生情况。结果 3组患者的临床基线资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。与推广前组相比,推广后组的手术时长明显缩短[(207.3±36.0)min比(254.2±47.1)min,t=7.038,P<0.001],淋巴结清扫数目明显增多[(24.4±12.2)枚比(18.9±5.5)枚,t=2.900,P<0.001];而两组胃切除范围以及术后开放流质时间和住院时间方面,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。推广后组与对照组比较,手术时间较长[(207.3±36.0)min比(172.6±26.0)min,t=8.281,P<0.001],全胃切除术的比例较低[17.6%(18/102)比29.7%(41/138),χ^(2)=7.380,P=0.007],术后开放流质时间较长[(6.3±3.2)d比(5.5±3.0)d,t=2.029,P=0.044],住院时间也较长[(14.3±5.6)d比(10.1±4.8)d,t=6.036,P<0.001];而在淋巴结清扫数目方面,两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后并发症发生率推广后组为9.8%(10/102),低于推广前组的23.9%(11/46),差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=5.183,P=0.023),而推广后组与对照组[9.8%(10/102)比6.5%(9/138),χ^(2)=0.867,P=0.352]比较,差异无统计学意义。结论经过胃癌腹腔镜规范化治疗技术推广后,区域医疗中心腹腔镜胃癌手术的规范化程度有所提高,手术并发症发生率下降,接近大型综合性三甲医院水平,胃癌腹腔镜规范化治疗技术值得在区域医疗中心普及和推广。 Objective To explore the promotion effect of laparoscopic standardized surgery for gastric cancer observational in some regional medical centers in Shanghai.Methods A retrospective cohort study was carried out.Eleven regional medical centers in Shanghai received the promotion program of laparoscopic standardized surgery for gastric cancer,which was led by Ruijin Hospital,Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine(Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center)from January to December 2020.Clinicopathological data of gastric cancer patients treated at these 11 regional medical centers before and after the promotion program were collected.Inclusion criteria were as follows:patients undergoing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy or total gastrectomy;gastric cancer confirmed by pathology;without distant metastasis or peritoneal metastasis.Patients who did not undergo laparoscopic D2 radical resection,or received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery,or without complete clinical data were excluded.Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery from January to December 2019 were included in the pre-promotion group(46 cases).Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery from January to December 2021 were included in the post-promotion group(102 cases).In addition,patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery at Ruijin Hospital from January 2021 to December were included in the control group(138 cases).The baseline data,perioperative measurements postoperative complications,and pathological results of the three groups were analyzed and compared.Results There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics among the three groups(all P>0.05).Compared with the pre-promotion group,the operation time in post-promotion group was significantly shorter[(207.3±36.0)minutes vs.(254.2±47.1)minutes,t=7.038,P<0.001],and the number of harvested lymph node was significantly more(24.4±12.2 vs.18.9±5.5,t=2.900,P=0.004).However,there were no significant differences in the extent of resection,time to fluid intake,and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups(all P>0.05).Compared with the control group,the operation time[(207.3±36.0)minutes vs(172.6±26.0)minutes,t=8.281,P<0.001],time to fluid intake[(6.3±3.2)days than(5.5±3.0)days,t=2.029,P=0.044],and the postoperative hospital stay[(14.3±5.6)days vs.(10.1±4.8)days,t=6.036,P<0.001]in the post-promotion group were still longer.Total gastrectomy was less common in the post-promotion group compared with the control group[18 cases(17.6%)vs.41 cases(29.7%),χ^(2)=7.380,P=0.007].However,there was no significant difference in the number of harvested lymph node between the two groups(P>0.05).The morbidity of postoperative complication in the post-promotion group(9.8%,10/102)was significantly lower than that in the pre-promotion group(23.9%,11/46)(χ^(2)=5.183,P=0.023),while above morbidity was not significantly different between the post-promotion group and the control group[9.8%vs.6.5%(9/138),χ^(2)=0.867,P=0.352].Conclusion After the promotion of laparoscopic standardized surgery for gastric cancer in regional medical centers,the standardization degree of surgery has been improved,and the morbidity of postoperative complication decreases.Laparoscopic standardized surgery for gastric cancer can be promoted to more regional medical centers.
作者 沈晓东 徐明 苏畅 叶敏 李炜 杨振熙 韩江 张志奇 项洪刚 郁林海 孙鹏 黄文海 谢博文 关颖欣 蔡正昊 张文鹏 臧潞 Shen Xiaodong;Xu Ming;Su Chang;Ye Min;Li Wei;Yang Zhenxi;Han Jiang;Zhang Zhiqi;Xiang Honggang;Yu Linhai;Sun Peng;Huang Wenhai;Xie Bowen;Guan Yingxin;Cai Zhenghao;Zhang Wenpeng;Zang Lu(Department of General Surgery,Minhang Hospital,Fudan University,Shanghai 201199,China;Department of General Surgery,Pudong Hospital,Fudan University,Shanghai 201399,China;Department of General Surgery,Shanghai Pudong New District Punan Hospital,Shanghai 200125,China;Department of General Surgery,Shanghai Putuo District Central Hospital,Shanghai 200062,China;Department of General Surgery,Shanghai Seventh People's Hospital,Shanghai 200137,China;Department of General Surgery,Shanghai Pudong New District Zhoupu Hospital,Shanghai 201318,China;Department of General Surgery,Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital,Shanghai 200081,China;Department of General Surgery,Shanghai Pudong New District People's Hospital,Shanghai 201299,China;Department of General Surgery,Shanghai Songjiang Fangta Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanghai 201699,China;Department of General Surgery,Tongren Hospital,Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200050,China;Department of General Surgery,Jinshan Hospital,Fudan University,Shanghai 201508,China;Department of General Surgery,Ruijin Hospital,Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200025,China;Department of General Surgery,Luwan Branch of Ruijin Hospital,Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200020,China)
出处 《中华胃肠外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2022年第8期708-715,共8页 Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
基金 上海市卫生健康委员会、上海卫生系统先进适宜技术推广项目(2019SY030)。
关键词 胃肿瘤 腹腔镜手术 规范化 技术培训和推广 Stomach neoplasms Laparoscopic surgery,standardized Technical training
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献118

  • 1黄志良,束一鸣,许斌华,霍中华.全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术治疗胃癌临床观察[J].社区医学杂志,2020,18(24):1652-1655. 被引量:3
  • 2胃癌诊疗规范(2011年版)[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2012,4(5):62-71. 被引量:244
  • 3Woo Yong Lee,Jeong Seop Moon.Endoscopic treatment of efferent loop syndrome with insertion of double pigtail stent[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2013,19(41):7209-7212. 被引量:4
  • 4陈峻青.胃癌外科治疗的术式选择与评价[J].中华医学杂志,2004,84(24):2057-2059. 被引量:51
  • 5Kitano S,Iso Y,Moriyama M,et al.Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy.Surg Laparosc Endosc,1994,4 (2):146-148.
  • 6The Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.Guidelines for the treatment of gastric cancer.2nd ed.Tokyo:Kanehara,2004:61-66.
  • 7Kitano S,Shiraishi N,Uyama I,et al.A multicenter study on oncologic outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early cancer in Japan.Ann Surg,2007,245(1):68-72.
  • 8Kim W,Song KY,Lee HJ,et al.The impact of comorbidity on surgical outcomes in laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy:a retrospective analysis of multicenter results.Ann Surg,2008,248 (5):793-799.
  • 9Kim H,Hyung W,Cho G,et al.Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer:a Phase Ⅲ trial (KLASS trial):interim reports on morbidity and mortality.Clin Oncol,2008,26(15 suppl):4641.
  • 10Huscher CG,Mingoli A,Sgarzini G,et al.Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer:fiveyear results of a randomized prospective trial.Ann Surg,2005,241(2):232-237.

共引文献1625

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部