期刊文献+

城市对儿童友好吗?——城市儿童友好度评价体系构建及在C市的应用 被引量:1

Are Cities Friendly to Children?——Construction of Child-Friendliness Evaluation System and Its Application in City C
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着全球城市化进程的不断推进,预计到2050年全世界近70%的儿童将生活在城市。因此,如何在人口城市化快速发展的进程中给儿童提供更好的生存发展机会,对所有城市管理者的智慧和能力提出了巨大考验。通过细化非歧视权、被倾听权、公共服务权、居住环境权和生活娱乐权五个维度的测量指标,构建起城市儿童友好度评价体系,并采用分层抽样方式,对C市665名六年级儿童进行问卷调查,得出C市儿童友好度的主观评分为84.28分,综合评分为61.59分。为了提升C市的儿童友好度,政府和社会需要进一步拓宽儿童政策参与的渠道,提高父母对社会安全的信任度,拓展和丰富儿童的休闲娱乐场地与娱乐方式。 It is expected that nearly 70%of children will live in cities by 2050 due to the gradual promotion of global urbanization,which greatly challenges city management in providing opportunities for children develop⁃ment.By refining five indicators:The right to non-discrimination,the right to be heard;the right to public service;the right to living environment;and the right to life and entertainment,this paper constructs a Child-Friendliness evaluation system.At the same time,665 children in sixth grade in City C were investigated by stratified sampling method.It is concluded that the subjective score of Child-Friendliness in City C is 84.28 and the comprehensive score is 61.59.In order to improve the Child-Friendliness of City C,the government and society need to further broaden the channels for children to participate in political affairs;improve parents’trust in social security;and enrich the leisure and entertainment venues and ways for teenagers.
作者 周美多 王佳鑫 ZHOU Mei-duo;WANG Jia-xin(School of Public Affairs and Administration,University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,Chengdu 611731,China)
出处 《山东行政学院学报》 2022年第5期71-80,共10页 Journal of Shandong Academy of Governance
基金 教育部人文社科研究青年基金西部项目“我国育龄人口二孩生育意愿及其社会政策支持研究:基于工作—生活平衡的视角”(17XJC840004) 四川省社科研究“十三五”规划项目“家庭发展能力下的生育意愿及其社会政策支持机制研究”(SC20B114)。
关键词 儿童福利 儿童友好城市 评价体系 child welfare child-friendly city evaluation system
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献30

  • 1Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory [M], 3nd Edition. New York: Mc- Graw-Hill, 1994.
  • 2James RM. The relationship between number of response categories and reliability oflikert-type questionnaires [J]. J Edu Meas, 1974, 11: 49- 53.
  • 3EU P. COX IIl. The optimal number of response alternatives for a scale: a review[J]. J Mark Res, 1980, 17: 407-422.
  • 4Duane F, Alwin. Information transmission in the survey interview: number of response categories and the reliability of attitude measurement[J]. Soeio Meth, 1992, 22:83-118.
  • 5Debroah LB,Craig KE. The effects of nonnormality and number of response categories on reliability[J]. Appl Meas Educ, 1996, 9: 151-160.
  • 6Carolyn CP, Andrew MC. Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent Preferences[J]. Acta Psychol, 2000, 104: 1-15.
  • 7Li-Jen Weng. Impact of the number of response categories and anchorlabels on coefficient alpha and test-retest reliability [J]. Educ Psychol Meas, 2004, 64: 956-972.
  • 8Luis ML, Eduardo Garcta-Cueto. Effect of the number of response categories on the reliability and validity of rating scales [J].Methodology, 2008, 4: 73-79.
  • 9Alberto Maydeu-Olivares, Uwe K, Donna C. The effect of varying the number of response alternatives in rating scales: experimental evidence from intra-individual effects[ J ]. Behav Res Meth, 2009, 41: 295-308.
  • 10Jacob Y, Michael SM. Three-point likert scales are good enough [J]. J Market Res, 1971, 3:495-500.

共引文献101

同被引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部