基于CiteSpace的生态瞬时评估法对国外关于疲乏的纵向研究文献进行计量学及可视化分析

Bibliometric and visual analysis of ecological momentary assessment based on CiteSpace in forein longitudinal study on fatigue

目的:分析生态瞬时评估法在疲乏纵向研究中的研究现状、趋势和发展前沿,为生态瞬时评估法在我国的进一步发展与应用提供参考和方向。方法:Web of Science核心合集数据库为数据来源,运用CiteSpace软件从文献年度发文量、国家和机构、学科领域分布、高频关键词及文献共被引5个方面进行可视化分析。结果:纳入444篇文献,发文量呈逐年上升趋势;美国发文量居首位;高强度突现学科为“ONCOLOGY”“NURSING”“PUBLIC,ENVIRONMENTAL&OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH”等;高频关键词为疲乏、生活质量、抑郁、症状、疼痛等;形成10个聚类群,分别为研究的疾病、内容与方法3个方面;被引文献的被引频次与中心性均较低。结论:目前生态瞬时评估法在国外疲乏纵向研究的领域与范围较小,多集中在临床医学护理领域,未来研究的热点会是抑郁、疼痛、失眠以及症状群等与生活质量相关的内容,提示研究者今后不仅要注重研究方向与研究内容的深层次开展,更要关注新方向、新主题的研究。

Objective:To analyze the research status quo,trends,and development frontiers of Ecological Momentary Assessment(EMA)applied in the longitudinal study on fatigue and to provide reference and direction for the further development and application of EMA in China.Methods:The Web of Science core collection database was used as the data source,and CiteSpace software was used to conduct visual analysis from five aspects:the annual number of papers,countries and institutions,the distribution of disciplines,high-frequency keywords,and the total cited literature.Results:A total of 444 papers were included,and the number of published papers showed an increasing trend year by year.The number of published articles issued by the United States ranked first.High intensity emergent disciplines included:"ONCOLOGY","NURSING","PUBLIC,ENVIRONMENTAL&OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH",etc.High-frequency keywords were fatigue,quality of life,depression,symptoms,pain,etc.A total of 10 clusters were formed and divided into three aspects of the study:disease,content,and method.The citation frequency and centrality of cited articles were lower.Conclusions:At present,the field and scope of EMA applied in the longitudinal study on fatigue were relatively small,and most were concentrated in clinical medicine and nursing.The future research will focus on depression,pain,insomnia,symptom groups,and other content related to the quality of life,which suggests that researchers should not only pay attention to the in-depth development of research direction and content,but also to the research of new directions and new topics.