期刊文献+

准实验中常用的统计分析方法及其在医学中的应用 被引量:1

Common statistical methods used in quasi-experimental studies and applications in medicine
原文传递
导出
摘要 受医学伦理或实际环境限制,随机对照试验的开展往往会受到限制。准实验研究通过控制研究的混杂效应,可在非随机化条件下进行因果推断,在某些情况下成为随机对照试验的替代选择。本文从准实验研究设计的基本思想、特点、局限性及在医学中的应用等角度,介绍准实验研究中常用的统计分析方法,包括双重差分模型、工具变量法、断点回归设计、间断时间序列模型等,以期为以后准实验研究提供参考。 Randomized controlled trials(RCTs)are often limited because of ethical or operational reasons.Quasiexperimental studies could be an alternative to RCTs to make causal inferences without randomization by controlling the confounding effects of the study.This paper introduced the general statistical analysis methods of quasi-experimental design through basic ideas,characteristics,limitations and applications in medicine,including difference-in-difference models,instrumental variables,regression discontinuity design,interrupted time series,and so on,and to provide references for future research.
作者 罗枭 何倩 秦婴逸 吴骋 贺佳 LUO Xiao;HE Qian;QIN Yingyi;WU Cheng;HE Jia(Department of Miltary Health Statistics,Naval Medical University,Shanghai 200433,P.R.China)
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2022年第9期1080-1084,共5页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基金 上海市公共卫生体系建设学科带头人计划项目(编号:GWV-10.2-XD05) 上海市公共卫生体系建设学科建设项目(编号:GWV-10.1-XK05) 军队双重建设项目(编号:03)。
关键词 准实验 混杂因素 校正 统计方法 Quasi-experimental study Confounding factor Adjustment Statistical method
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献84

  • 1中国心血管健康与疾病报告编写组,王增武,胡盛寿.中国心血管健康与疾病报告2019概要[J].中华老年病研究电子杂志,2020(4):4-15. 被引量:928
  • 2王贞,封进.长期护理保险对医疗费用的替代效应及不同补偿模式的比较[J].经济学(季刊),2021,20(2):557-576. 被引量:59
  • 3周黎安,陈烨.中国农村税费改革的政策效果:基于双重差分模型的估计[J].经济研究,2005,40(8):44-53. 被引量:452
  • 4Liu XN,Yan H,Wang DL. The evaluation of "Safe Motherhood" program on maternal care utilization in rural western China:a difference in difference approach[J].BMC Public Health,2010.566.
  • 5Mayer,Bruce D. Natural and quasi-experiments in economics[J].Journal of Business and Economy Statistics,1995,(02):151-161.
  • 6Ashenfelter O, Card D. Using the longitudinal structure of earnings to estimate the effect of training programs. The Review of Economics and Statistics,1985,67(4) :648-660.
  • 7Meyer BD. Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 1995,13 (2) : 151-161.
  • 8Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S. How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates. The Quarterly Journal of Eco- nomics ,2004,119 ( 1 ) :249-275.
  • 9Athey S, Imbens GW. Identification and inference in nonlinear differ- ence-in-differences models. Econometrica,2006,74 ( 2 ) :431-497.
  • 10Smart EA,Huskamp HA,Duckworth K, et al. Using propensity scores in difference-in-differences models to estimate the effects of a policy change. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol,2014,114(4) :166-182.

共引文献204

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部