期刊文献+

FRAX联合骨密度和骨代谢标志物评估甲状腺癌术后患者骨折风险的临床研究

A Clinical Study of FRAX Fracture Risk Assessment Tool Combined withBone Minera Density and Bone Metabolic Markers to Evaluate Fracture Risk in Postoperative Patients with Thyroid Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨骨密度和骨代谢标志物联合骨折风险评估工具(fracture risk assessment tool,FRAX)评估甲状腺癌术后患者骨折风险。方法我院2018年6月至2020年12月期间,门诊和住院的年龄超过40岁的甲状腺癌术后患者286例,其中男57例,女229例,年龄40~78岁,平均年龄57.3±19.9岁。获取患者的骨密度(DXA)、骨代谢标志物(BTM)结果、基本信息并计算患者FRAX骨折风险评估系数。以髋部骨折风险系数≥3%或任何重要的骨质疏松骨折风险系数≥20%作为高风险截断值。结果(1)BTM高转换组骨质疏松(T值≤-2.5)比例:66/174=37.9%;低转换组骨质疏松(T值≤-2.5)比例:21/112=18.8%。(2)BTM高转换组骨量减少(-2.5<T<-1)比例:82/174=47.2%;低转换组骨量减少(-2.5<T<-1)比例:29/112=25.9%;(3)BTM高转换组骨密度正常(T≥-1)比例:26/174=14.9%;低转换组骨密度正常(T≥-1)比例:20/112=17.9%;(4)BTM高转换组FRAX高风险比例:72/174=41.4%;低转换组FRAX高风险比例:29/112=25.9%;(5)DXA骨质疏松组FRAX高风险比例:57/87=65.6%;(6)DXA骨量减少组FRAX高风险比例:37/137=27.0%;(7)DXA骨量正常组FRAX高风险比例:8/137=5.8%。结论对于年龄大于40岁的甲状腺癌术后激素替代治疗患者,采用DXA、BTM联合FRAX对患者进行骨折风险综合评估,预测骨质疏松及骨折风险准确性更高。 Objective To explore bone mineral density and bone metabolic markers combined with FRAX(fracture risk assessment tool,FRAX)fracture risk assessment tool to evaluate the risk of fracture in postoperative patients with thyroid cancer.Methods From June,2018 to December,2020,there were 286 outpatients and inpatients over 40 years old with postoperative hormone replacement for thyroid cancer in our hospital.Bone mineral density(DXA),bone metabolic markers(BTM)and basic information of these patients were obtained and the risk assessment coefficient of FRAX fracture was calculated.The risk factor of hip fracture≥3%or the risk factor of any important osteoporotic fracture≥20%were applied as the high-risk cutoff values.Results(1)The proportion of osteoporosis(T value≤-2.5)in BTM high conversion group was 66/174=37.9%,and that in low conversion group(T value≤-2.5mm)was 21/112,=18.8%.(2)The proportion of bone mass reduction(-2.5<T<-1)in BTM high conversion group was 82/174=47.2%,and low conversion group(-2.5<T<-1)was 55/112=49.1%.(3)The proportion of normal bone mineral density(T≥-1)in BTM high conversion group was 26/174=14.9%,and low conversion group(T≥-1)was 36/112=32.1%.(4)High risk ratio of FRAX in BTM high conversion group was 72/174=41.4%,and FRAX high risk ratio in low conversion group was 29/112=25.9%.(5)High risk ratio of FRAX in DXA osteoporosis group was 57/87=65.6%.(6)High risk ratio of FRAX in DXA bone mass reduction group was 37/137=27.0%.(7)The high risk ratio of FRAX in the group with normal DXA bone mass was:8/137=5.8%.Conclusion For patients older than 40 years old who received postoperative hormone replacement therapy for thyroid cancer,DXA and BTM combined with FRAX fracture risk assessment can be used to comprehensively evaluate the patients,and the prediction of osteoporosis and fracture risk is more accurate.
作者 吴倩 王亚楠 鹿峰 贾英男 傅宁 鹿存芝 WU Qian;WANG Yanan;LU Feng;JIA Yingnan;FU Ning;LU Cunzhi(Department of Nuclear Medicine,Xuzhou Central Hospital,Xuzhou 221009,China)
出处 《标记免疫分析与临床》 CAS 2022年第8期1359-1362,1401,共5页 Labeled Immunoassays and Clinical Medicine
基金 2018市科技局重点研发(编号:KC18194)。
关键词 甲状腺癌术后 骨质疏松 骨折风险评估工具 骨密度 骨代谢标志物 Postoperative thyroid cancer Osteoporosis Fracture risk assessment tools Bone mineraldensity Bone metabolic markers
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献62

  • 1张智海,沈建雄,刘忠厚.DXA骨密度仪在国内标一化回顾性研究[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2005,11(2):133-139. 被引量:7
  • 2刘广源,邱贵兴,吴志宏.使用NORLAND骨密度仪比较不同人种峰值骨量值[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2007,13(2):101-104. 被引量:8
  • 3Nix P,Nicolaides A, Coatesworth A P. Thyroid cancer review 1 : presentation and investigation of thyroid cancer. Int J Clin Pract, 2005,59( 11 ) :1340-1344.
  • 4Beeker D V, Sawin C T. Radioiodine and thyroid disease: the beginning. Semin Nucl Med, 1996,26 ( 3 ) : 155-164.
  • 5Schlumberger M,Ricard M, De Pouvourville G, et al. How the availability of recombinant human TSH has changed the management of patients who have thyroid cancer. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab,2007,3 (9) :641-650.
  • 6Mallick U, Harmer C, Yap B, et al. Ablation with low-dose radioiodine and thyrotropin alfa in thyroid cancer. N Engl J Med, 2012,366(18) :1674-1685.
  • 7Schlumberger M, Catargi B, Borget I, et al. Strategies of radioiodine ablation in patients with low-risk thyroid cancer. N Engl J Med,2012,366 ( 18 ) : 1663-1673.
  • 8ChengW, Ma C, Fu H, et al. Low-or high-dose radioiodine remnant ablation for differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a meta- analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2013,98 (4) : 1353-1360.
  • 9Mcdougal I, Bayer M. Follow-up of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer using serum thyroglobulin measured by an immunoradiometric assay. Comparison with 13tI total body scans. J Nucl Med,1980(21 ) :741-744.
  • 10Pacini F, Agate L, Elisei R. Outcome of differentiated thyroid cancer with dectectable serum Tg and negative diagnostic 1311 whole body scan: comparison of treated with high J3tI active versus untreated patients. J Clin Endocr Metab,2001 (86) :4092-4097.

共引文献1834

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部