期刊文献+

地铁应急接驳公交派车场站选择与行车计划协同优化

Integrated Optimization of Dispatching Depot Choice and Scheduling for Emergency Bridging Bus in Response to Metro Disruption
下载PDF
导出
摘要 地铁网络发生区间故障后,广泛采用应急接驳公交维持公共交通的服务保障能力。为提高地铁应急接驳公交运行效率,减少应急公交数量和乘客时间损失,以公交备选派车场站是否被选择、派车场站的公交停放能力以及应急接驳公交快慢车方案为决策变量,建立地铁应急接驳公交派车场站选择与行车计划协同优化模型,通过线性化处理以及ε-约束法,将模型转化为单目标线性规划模型。以某地铁线网为例,通过Gurobi求解模型的帕累托最优前沿,结果表明:相比无快车模式,所提方法在不增加公交数量的情况下,可增加总发车次数,使得乘客时间损失降低4.17%;应急公交数量和乘客时间损失具有负相关性,决策者可根据实际需求权衡两个目标;公交派车场站应尽可能地均匀分散选择;增加公交派车场站数量可降低乘客时间损失,但增加派车场站数量产生的边际效益逐渐降低,实际派车场站数量可根据实际情况酌情确定。 After an interval failure occurs in the metro network, emergency bridging buses are widely used to maintain the service guarantee capability of public transportation. To improve the operation efficiency of emergency bridging buses and reduce the total number of bridging buses and passengers′ time loss, an integrated optimization model of dispatching depot choice and scheduling for emergency bridging bus was proposed. The decision variables were whether the alternative dispatching depots were selected, the bus parking capacity of each depot and express/local plan for bridging buses under emergencies. The original model was transformed into a linear programming model with a single objective by linearization and ε-constraint method. Taking one metro network as an example, the Pareto optimal frontier of this model was determined by Gurobi solver. The results showed that the proposed method was able to increase the total number of departures and reduce the passengers′ time loss by 4.17% without increasing the number of buses compared with the no express bus method;there was a negative correlation between the total number of bridging buses and the passengers′ time loss, and decision-makers could realize a trade-off between these two objectives according to the needs;the chosen dispatching depots should be distributed as evenly as possible;increasing the number of bus dispatching depots could reduce passengers′ time loss, but the marginal benefit of increasing dispatching depots was gradually declining. Therefore, the actual number of dispatching depots can be determined according to the actual situation.
作者 冯旭杰 宋晓敏 陈明星 何祥 李佳杰 FENG Xu-jie;SONG Xiao-min;CHEN Ming-xing;HE Xiang;LI Jia-jie(China Academy of Transportation Sciences,Beijing 100029,China;Transportation Development Center for Fujian Province,Fuzhou 350025,China)
出处 《交通运输研究》 2022年第4期55-64,共10页 Transport Research
基金 中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费项目(20194811)。
关键词 地铁网络 应急接驳公交 派车场站选择 行车计划 快慢车 metro network emergency bridging bus dispatching depot choice bus scheduling express/local bridging bus
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献61

  • 1杨丰梅,华国伟,邓猛,黎建强.选址问题研究的若干进展[J].运筹与管理,2005,14(6):1-7. 被引量:75
  • 2马云峰,杨超,张敏,郝春艳.基于时间满意的最大覆盖选址问题[J].中国管理科学,2006,14(2):45-51. 被引量:79
  • 3王非,徐渝,李毅学.离散设施选址问题研究综述[J].运筹与管理,2006,15(5):64-69. 被引量:62
  • 4李端,钱富才,李力,高建军.动态规划问题研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007,27(8):56-64. 被引量:30
  • 5房霄虹.城市轨道交通网络化运输组织协调理论及方法研究[D].北京:北京交通大学,2011.
  • 6Ratnaweera A, Halgamuge SK, Watson HC. Selforganizing Hierarchical Particle Swarm Optimizer with Time - varying Acceleration Coefficients. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2004 ( 3 ) 240 - 255.
  • 7Paraskevi S. Georgiadou,Ioannis A. Papazoglou,Chris T. Kiranoudis,Nikolaos C. Markatos.Multi-objective evolutionary emergency response optimization for major accidents[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials . 2010 (1)
  • 8Konstantinos G. Zografos,Konstantinos N. Androutsopoulos.A decision support system for integrated hazardous materials routing and emergency response decisions[J]. Transportation Research Part C . 2008 (6)
  • 9Luce Brotcorne,Gilbert Laporte,Frédéric Semet.Ambulance location and relocation models[J]. European Journal of Operational Research . 2002 (3)
  • 10Takeo Yamada.A network flow approach to a city emergency evacuation planning[J]. International Journal of Systems Science . 1996 (10)

共引文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部