期刊文献+

合理情绪及系统脱敏疗法对肝硬化套扎患者焦虑和疼痛的影响 被引量:2

Study the effect of systemic desensitization and rational emotive therapy on anxiety and pain in patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing ligation
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]研究合理情绪及系统脱敏疗法对肝硬化套扎患者焦虑和疼痛的影响。[方法]选取行食管静脉曲张套扎术的患者60例,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组各30例。对照组采用传统心理护理及消化内科护理常规,观察组在对照组治疗基础上使用合理情绪及系统脱敏疗法。采用焦虑评分量表(SAS)及语言评分法(VRS)评价2组患者焦虑及疼痛状态。[结果]干预1周后,SAS评分观察组(42.34±3.17)分低于对照组(50.53±3.87)分;观察组0~I级疼痛占比(93.3%)大于对照组(80.0%),Ⅱ~Ⅲ级疼痛占比(6.7%)小于对照组(20.0%),2组比较均差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。[结论]合理情绪及系统脱敏疗法应用在聚桂醇注射联合内镜套扎术中可以减轻患者焦虑,降低患者术后疼痛感,具有临床应用价值。 [Objective]To study the effect of rational emotive and systematic desensitization therapy on anxiety and pain in patients with liver cirrhosis.[Methods]A total of 60 patients admitted for esophageal avarices veins were randomly divided into observation group and control group,with 30 patients in each group.The control group adopted the traditional psychological nursing and the routine nursing in the Department of Digestive Medicine.The observation group used the reasonable emotion and the system desensitization therapy in the control group foundation.The state of anxiety and pain was evaluated by anxiety scale(SAS)and language rating scale(VRS).[Results]After one week intervention,the scores of SAS in the observation group(42.34±3.17)were lower than those in the control group(50.53±3.87),the rate of Grade 0-I pain in the observation group(93.3%)was higher than that in the control group(80.0%),the rate of gradeⅡvs-Ⅲpain in the observation group(6.7%)was lower than that in the control group(20.0%),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).[Conclusion]Rational emotive and systematic desensitization therapy can relieve anxiety and reduce postoperative pain in polyol injection combined with endoscopic ligation,which has clinical value.
作者 靳小雯 李燕玲 卢莹 王红丽 李萍 徐玉兰 JIN Xiao-wen;LI Yan-ling;LU Ying;WANG Hong-li;LI Ping;XU Yu-lan(Department of Gastroenterology,Union Hospital of Huazhong University of Science and Technology,430022 Wuhan,Hubei,China;Department of Nursing,Union Hospital of Huazhong University of Science and Technology,430022 Wuhan,Hubei,China)
出处 《临床消化病杂志》 CAS 2022年第4期288-290,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology
关键词 肝硬化 合理情绪及系统脱敏疗法 焦虑 疼痛 liver cirrhosis rational emotive and systemic desensitization ligation anxiety pain
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献48

  • 1中华医学会消化内镜学分会食管胃静脉曲张学组.消化道静脉曲张及出血的内镜诊断和治疗规范试行方案(2009年)[J].中国继续医学教育,2010,2(6):21-26. 被引量:200
  • 2张明,王渊,刘海,章士正,鱼博浪,陈燕,王微微.小脑参与痛觉调节的fMRI研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2006,22(1):27-30. 被引量:16
  • 3程留芳.食管静脉曲张破裂出血内镜下治疗的评价与展望[J].中华消化杂志,2007,27(4):255-256. 被引量:59
  • 4Ferreira-Valente M A, Pais-Ribeiro J L, Jensen M P. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales [J]. Pain, 2011,152(10) : 2399-2404.
  • 5Herr K A, Spratt K, Mobily P R, et al. Pain intensity assessment in older adults: use of experimental pain to compare psychometric properties and usability of selected pain scales with younger adults [J]. Clin J Pain, 2004,20(4) :207-219.
  • 6Miro J, Castarlenas E, Huguet A. Evidence for the use of a numerical rating scale to assess the intensity of pediatric pain [J]. Eur J Pain, 2009, 13(10) : 1089-1095.
  • 7Miro J, Huguet A, Nieto R, et al. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and preference for a pain intensity scale for use with the elderly [J]. J Pain, 2005,6( 11 ) :727-735.
  • 8Breivik E K, Bjornsson G A, Skovlund E. A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data [J]. Clin J Pain, 2000, 16( 1 ) :22-28.
  • 9Weber M, Schuz J, Kuball J, et al. Pain assessment in invasive diagnostic procedures. Comparison of an eleven-point numerical rating scale and a six-point verbal rating scale for pain measurement in bone marrow puncture [J]. Schmerz, 2005,19(6) :513-516,518-519.
  • 10Philip B K. Parametric statistics for evaluation of the visual analog scale [J]. Anesth Analg, 1990,71(6) :710.

共引文献761

同被引文献24

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部