摘要
当前国内的知识产权纠纷调解机制主要采用“管理型模式”,其存在社会信任度低、被异化为“类审判”模式和公权力保障不足等弊端。基于知识产权纠纷调解机制的独立性与不可替代性,有必要对该机制的模式进行重塑。一方面,在调解的过程中需强化行政公权力对调解规范的引导,将调解员身份定位为服务者,着重强调当事人意思自治下的利益共享。另一方面,以《民事诉讼法》修订为契机,对调解协议的法律效力予以确认,赋予其可强制执行的效力,真正达到定分止争的效果。通过从公权力空缺到公权力引导的转换,实现知识产权纠纷调解机制从“管理型”向“服务型”的模式转型,进而真正实现该机制提升纠纷解决效率与为行政司法分流的意义与价值。
Nowadays,the intellectual property mediation mechanism mainly adopts the"administrative operation mode".On the one hand,the mediator and the parties are still in the role of"similar trial",which deviates from the original intention of the mechanism.On the other hand,the existing mediation mechanism also has the realistic di⁃lemma of insufficient protection of government power,which makes it difficult for the parties to trust it.In this sense,it is necessary to clarify the independence and irreplaceable of the intellectual property mediation mechanism and its es⁃sential characteristics as a diversion of administrative and justice,and then further promotes the transformation of the mechanism from"administrative model"to"service model"under the path guidance of from the vacancy of government power to the guidance of government power.In 2021,the Civil Procedure Law expanded the scope of judicial confirma⁃tion,which provided the possibility to reshape the intellectual property mediation mechanism.
作者
徐明
岳浩然
Xu Ming;Yue Haoran(Shanghai International Intellectual Property School,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China)
出处
《科技与法律(中英文)》
CSSCI
2022年第5期66-75,94,共11页
Science Technology and Law(Chinese-English Version)
基金
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金支持项目“国际知识产权商事调解协议执行机制研究”(22120200373)。
关键词
知识产权纠纷调解
服务型调解
管理型调解
公权力引导
intellectual property mediation
service model mediation
administrative mediation
government power guidance