法律的概念:哈特与富勒之争——以“理想类型”的建构为视角的分析

The Concept of Law: The Debate between H.L.A. Hart and Lon L. Fuller——Analysis from the Perspective of the Construction of "Ideal Types"

哈特与富勒各自所提出的“法律的概念”实际上都是马克斯·韦伯所说的“理想类型”。以“理想类型”的建构为视角的分析表明,相较于哈特而言,富勒所建构的“法律的概念”更反映了法律实践的现实面貌,也能跨越事实与价值的鸿沟,以及形式理性与实质理性的天堑。

The concepts of law proposed by H.L.A. Hart and Lon L. Fuller are actually what Max Weber called "ideal types". The analysis from the perspective of the construction of "ideal type" shows that, compared with Hart,the "concept of law" constructed by Fuller reflects the reality of legal practice, and can also bridge the gap between fact and value, and formal rationality and substantive rationality.