期刊文献+

Vivo Mobile Communications Co.,Ltd.v.Shenzhen Youpintong Electronic Technology Co.,Ltd.et al.

原文传递
导出
摘要 Docket No.:16190,second instance(终),civil case(民),(2020)Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court in Guangdong Province(粤03)Lower Court Docket No.:3587,first instance(初),civil case(民),(2019)Futian District People's Court of Shenzhen(粤0304)SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT The essence of punitive damages is that the amount of compensation shall be greater than the actual damages(infringement profits).For malicious infringement of the exclusive right to use trademark with serious circumstance,if the right holder claims for punitive damages,the people's court may support its claim according to the principle of"case-by-case application and application as required".When determining the amount of compensation,the people's court should try to find the optimal solution.
出处 《China Intellectual Property》 2021年第3期60-62,共3页 中国知识产权(英文版)
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部