期刊文献+

需求信息不对称下供应链中流程与产品创新模式选择研究 被引量:1

Research on Selection of Process and Product Innovation Modes in Supply Chains under Asymmetric Demand Information
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在制造商进行流程创新和产品创新的供应链中,当需求预测信息不对称时,研究了零售商的需求信息分享策略以及制造商最优创新模式。利用精炼贝叶斯理论和Stackelberg博弈模型,首先求得了每一种创新模式下信息分享价值、促进需求信息分享的激励机制以及供应链均衡的信息分享策略,其次对两种创新模式下利润进行对比分析。研究发现,在两种创新供应链模型中,当创新效率较高和较低时,零售商自愿分享和不分享需求信息分别是均衡策略;当创新效率处于中间水平时,通过设计一个讨价还价机制可以使零售商分享需求信息成为一个均衡。此外,当消费者对质量(价格)更敏感时,制造商选择产品创新(流程创新)模式可以使供应链成员都获益。 In the supply chains with process innovation or product innovation,when the demand forecasting information is asymmetric,this paper studies the retailer’s demand information sharing strategy and the manufacturer’s optimal innovation mode.Using refined Bayesian theory and Stackelberg game models,this paper firstly derives the value of information sharing of each mode,and then investigates an incentive mechanism that induces the retailer to share demand information and equilibrium information sharing strategies.Secondly,this paper compares the profits under the two kinds of innovation model.The research shows that in both models,when innovation efficiency is high and low,retailers’voluntary sharing and non-sharing of demand information are respectively equilibrium strategies.When innovation efficiency is in the middle level,a bargaining mechanism can be designed to enable retailers to share demand information.In addition,when consumers are more sensitive to products’quality(price),manufacturers can benefit all members of the supply chain by choosing the product innovation(process innovation)model.
作者 张梁梁 张盼 ZHANG Liang-liang;ZHANG Pan(School of Economics and Management,Chang'an University,Xi'an 710064,China;School of Management,Hainan University,Haikou 570228,China)
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2022年第9期128-134,共7页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71961019) 国家社会科学基金资助项目(18CJL048) 中央高校基本科研业务专项基金(300102231649)。
关键词 流程创新 产品创新 信息分享 讨价还价机制 process innovation product innovation information sharing bargaining mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献96

  • 1李丽君,黄小原,庄新田.双边道德风险条件下供应链的质量控制策略[J].管理科学学报,2005,8(1):42-47. 被引量:92
  • 2李善良,朱道立.逆向信息和道德风险下的供应链线性激励契约研究(英文)[J].运筹学学报,2005,9(2):21-29. 被引量:19
  • 3李善良,朱道立.不对称信息下供应链线性激励契约委托代理分析[J].计算机集成制造系统,2005,11(12):1758-1762. 被引量:57
  • 4Leimeister J M, Huber M, Bretschneider U, et al. Le- veraging crowdsourcing: activation-supporting compo- nents for IT-based ideas competition[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2009, 26 (1) : 197 - 224.
  • 5Ngwenyama O K, Sullivan W E. Outsourcing contractsas instruments of risk management: insights from two successful public contracts[J]. Journal of Enterprise In- formation Management, 2007, 20(6) :615-640.
  • 6张维迎.博弈论和信息经济学[J].上海:上海人民出版社,1996.
  • 7Amit R, Glosten L, Muller E. Entrepreneurial ability, venture investments, and risk sharing[J]. Management Science, 1990,36(10): 1233-1246.
  • 8Rochet J C, Stole L A. Nonlinear pricing with random participation [J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2002, 69(1): 277-311.
  • 9Bahli B, Rivard S. The information technology out- sourcing risk: a transaction cost and agency theory- based perspective[J]. Journal of Information Technolo- gy, 2003, 18(3): 211-221.
  • 10Bryson K, Sullivan W E. Designing effective incentive- oriented contracts for application service provider hos- ting of ERP systems[J] Business Process Management Journal, 2003, 9(6): 705-721.

共引文献92

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部