期刊文献+

达芬奇机器人手术系统辅助与腹腔镜辅助近端胃癌根治性全胃切除+保脾脾门淋巴结清扫的短期疗效研究 被引量:8

Short-term efficacy of Da Vinci robot versus laparoscopic-assisted radical total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer with spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨达芬奇机器人手术系统辅助对近端胃癌根治性全胃切除+保脾脾门淋巴结清扫的安全性、可行性及短期临床疗效,以明确达芬奇机器人手术系统相较于传统腹腔镜在保脾脾门淋巴结清扫上是否具有优势。方法回顾性分析2017年1月—2020年12月中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九四〇医院119例行根治性全胃切除+保脾脾门淋巴结清扫的近端胃癌患者的临床资料。其中,62例行达芬奇机器人手术系统根治性全胃切除+保脾脾门淋巴结清扫(机器人组),57例行腹腔镜根治性全胃切除+保脾脾门淋巴结清扫(腹腔镜组)。比较两组患者一般资料、术中情况、术后及并发症情况。结果两组患者年龄、性别构成、BMI、TNM分期、肿瘤直径、pT分期、pN分期、分化程度、病理类型、肿瘤部位等一般资料比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。机器人组术中出血量少于腹腔镜组(P<0.05),淋巴结清扫总数和第一站淋巴结数目多于腹腔镜组(P<0.05),术后首次排气时间早于腹腔镜组(P<0.05);两组第二站淋巴结数目、脾门淋巴结总数、脾门淋巴结阳性率、手术时间、引流管拔管时间、术后住院时间及术后并发症比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论达芬奇机器人手术系统辅助对近端胃癌患者行根治性全胃切除+保脾脾门淋巴结清扫是安全可行的,机器人组在淋巴结清扫总数、控制术中出血及肠道恢复上可能更具一定的优势。 Objective To investigate the safety,feasibility,and short-term clinical efficacy of Da Vinci robotassisted radical total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer with spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection,in order to clarify whether the Da Vinci robot has advantages over conventional laparoscopy for spleenpreserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection.Methods Retrospective analysis and selection of 119 patients with proximal gastric cancer who underwent radical total gastrectomy with spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection from January 2017 to December 2020,of which 62 cases underwent Da Vinci robot radical total gastrectomy and 57 cases underwent laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy.The general information,intraoperative postoperative,and complication conditions were compared between the two group.Results There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the comparison of general data of age,gender composition,BMI,TNM stage,tumor diameter,p T stage,pN stage,degree of differentiation,pathological type and tumor site(P>0.05).The robotic group had less intraoperative bleeding than the laparoscopic group(P<0.05),more total lymph node dissection than the laparoscopic group(P<0.05),more lymph nodes at the first station than the laparoscopic group(P<0.05),and the first postoperative venting was earlier than the laparoscopic group(P<0.05);the number of lymph nodes in the second station,the number of lymph nodes in the splenic portal,the positive rate of splenic portal lymph nodes,operative time,drainage tube extraction time,postoperative hospital stay,and postoperative complications were not statistically significant differences(P>0.05).Conclusion Da Vinci robotassisted radical total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer with spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection is safe and feasible,and the robotic group may have certain advantages in total lymph node dissection,control of intraoperative bleeding,and bowel recovery.
作者 何清远 于建平 李洪涛 陶瑞雨 陈为凯 陈超 李安东 卢顺利 韩晓鹏 Qing-yuan He;Jian-ping Yu;Hong-tao Li;Rui-yu Tao;Wei-kai Chen;Chao Chen;An-dong Li;Shun-li Lu;Xiao-peng Han(The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Lanzhou,Gansu 730000,China;Department of General,Gansu Central Hospital,Lanzhou,Gansu 730070,China;Department of General,The 940th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army,Lanzhou,Gansu 730050,China)
出处 《中国现代医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2022年第19期7-12,共6页 China Journal of Modern Medicine
基金 甘肃省自然科学基金(No:20JR5RA599,No:21JR11RA172) 甘肃省卫生健康行业科研项目(No:GSWSKY2021-015) 甘肃省青年科技基金计划(No:21JR7RA013)。
关键词 近端胃癌 全胃切除术 保脾脾门淋巴结清扫 达芬奇机器人手术系统 腹腔镜 微创手术 stomach neoplasms proximal total gastrectomy spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection Da Vinci surgical system laparoscopes minimally invasive surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献35

  • 1Keishiro Aoyagi,Kikuo Kouhuji,Motoshi Miyagi,Takuya Imaizumi,Junya Kizaki,Kazuo Shirouzu.Prognosis of metastatic splenic hilum lymph node in patients with gastric cancer after total gastrectomy and splenectomy[J].World Journal of Hepatology,2010,2(2):81-86. 被引量:27
  • 2Ting-Yu Mou,Yan-Feng Hu,Jiang Yu,Hao Liu,Ya-Nan Wang,Guo-Xin Li.Laparoscopic splenic hilum lymph node dissection for advanced proximal gastric cancer:A modified approach for pancreasand spleen-preserving total gastrectomy[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2013,19(30):4992-4999. 被引量:13
  • 3Tanirrnm S, Higashino M, Fukunaga Y, et al. Lapawscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: experience with more than 600 cases. Surg Endosc, 2008, 22 : 1161-1164.
  • 4Ofiate-Ocafia LF, Ochoa-Carrillo FJ. The role of minimal invasion surgery in the management of patients with gastric carcinoma. Cir Cir, 2003, 71:324-328.
  • 5Pugliese R, Maggioni D, Sansonna F, et al. Total and subtotal laparoscopic gastrectomy for adenoeaicinoma. Surg Endose, 2007, 21:21-27.
  • 6Weber KJ, Reyes CD, Gagner M, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for malignant disease. Surg Endose, 2003, 17:968-971.
  • 7Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, et al. Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg, 2005,241:232-237.
  • 8Uyama I, Sugioka A, Matsui H, et al. Laparoscopic D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer located in the middle or lower third portion of the stomach. Gastric Cancer, 2000, 3:50-55.
  • 9Ziqiang W, Feng Q, Zhimin C, et al. Comparison of laparoseopieally assisted and open radical distal gastrectomy with extended lymphadeneetomy for gastric cancer management. Surg Endose, 2006, 20 : 1738-1743.
  • 10Goh PMY, Khan AZ, So JB, et al. Early experience with laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2001, 11:83-87.

共引文献1254

同被引文献117

引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部