期刊文献+

注意偏侧化对驾驶视觉搜索的眼动表现证据 被引量:1

Eye-movement evidence of pseudoneglect on driving visual search bias
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为探究驾驶过程中伪忽视注意在不同道路等级条件下视觉搜索偏好的差异,通过实车驾驶的试验方法,记录15名驾驶人分别在3种真实道路环境(高速公路、快速公路、二级公路)驾驶过程的眼动数据(兴趣区、注视时长、注视点、瞳孔大小),以便发现驾驶人空间注意的视觉眼动搜索模式。结果表明:驾驶人首先表现出轻微偏左的不对称空间注意的特点,随着道路条件的复杂程度提高(从高速公路、快速公路到二级公路),驾驶人认知负荷提高,驾驶空间注意的眼动搜索呈现出趋中到趋右的安全搜索模式倾向。 In order to explore the difference in visual search preference of pseudoneglect during driving under different road grades,the experimental method of real car driving was adopted.The eye movement data(interest area,fixation duration,fixation point and pupil size)of 15 drivers driving in three real road environments(expressway,expressway,and secondary highway)were recorded to find the visual eye movement search pattern of drivers′spatial attention.The results show that the drivers first showed a slightly left-biased asymmetric spatial attention.With the increase in the complexity of road conditions(from the expressway,expressway to secondary highway),the cognitive load of drivers increased.The eye movement search of drivers′spatial attention showed a tendency from middle to right safety search mode.
作者 郑新夷 康良凯 苏应竑 杨艳群 ZHENG Xinyi;KANG Liangkai;SU Yinghong;YANG Yanqun(School of Humanities and Social Sciences,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou Fujian 350108,China;School of Civil Engineering,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou Fujian 350108,China)
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第S01期207-211,共5页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 福建省社会科学基金资助(2021B065)。
关键词 驾驶人 注意偏侧 视觉搜索 眼动数据 认知负荷 交通安全 driver pseudoneglect visual search eye movement data cognitive load traffic safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献57

  • 1徐家钰,梁新民.X形交叉口的改善[J].上海公路,1997,0(2):23-29. 被引量:2
  • 2中华人民共和国交通部.JTGB01-2003公路工程技术标准[S].北京:人民交通出版社,2003.
  • 3潘兵宏,赵一飞,杨少伟.驾驶员的操纵强度与公路几何设计[c]//长安大学特殊地区公路工程教育部重点实验室,《第五届交通运输领域国际学术会议》组委会,第五届交通运输领域国际学术会议论文集:道路工程分册.北京:人民交通出版社,2005:793-797.
  • 4杨少伟.道路勘测设计[M].2版.北京:人民交通出版社,2008:122-123.
  • 5Underwood G, Chapman P, Brocklehurst N, et al. Visualattention while driving: Sequences of eye fixations madeby experienced and novice drivers[J]. Ergonomics,2003,46(6): 629-646.
  • 6Martens M, Fox M. Does road familiarity change eyefixations. A comparison between watching a video andreal driving[J]. Transportation Research Part F: TrafficPsychology and Behaviour, 2007, 10(1): 33-47.
  • 7Lehtonen E,Lappi 0,Summala H. Anticipatory eyemovements when approaching a curve on a rural roaddepend on working memory load[J]. TransportationResearch Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,2012,15(3): 369-377.
  • 8Aimola, L., Schindler, I., Simone, A. M., & Venneri, A. (2012). Near and far space neglect: task sensitivity and anatomical substrates. Neuropsychologia, 50(6): 1115-1123.
  • 9Benedetto, S., Pedrotti, M., Bremond, R., & Baccino, T. (2013). Leftward attentional bias in a simulated driving task. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 20, 147-153.
  • 10Benwell, C. S. Y., Harvey, M., & Thut, G. (2014). On the neural origin of pseudoneglect: EEG-correlates of shifts in line bisection performance with manipulation of line length. Neuroimage, 86, 370-380.

共引文献39

同被引文献16

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部