摘要
“法律+技术”财产权模式的出现解决了传统知识产权依赖国家强制力实现产权的路径,但是技术发展对产权带来的强保护未必完全利于知识产权市场的长远发展。技术手段一方面降低了法律的执行成本,影响了知识产权缓冲带内新型产业市场的发展,另一方面以算法为主的技术手段影响了权利人的意思自治。因此若立法技术不能跟进新财产权模式的出现,现有的知识产权利益平衡局面将会被打破。立法者应审慎发展“法律+技术”的财产权模式,结合卡梅框架下“责任规则”与“财产规则”各自的优点,在符合网络效率要求的基础上降低交易成本,从而促进如二次创作短视频等版权市场的持续繁荣。
The emergence of the"law+technology"property rights model has solved the traditional IPR path of relying on state coercion to realize property rights,but the strong protection of property rights brought by technological development may not be fully conducive to the long-term development of the IPR market.On the one hand,technology reduces the cost of law enforcement and affects the development of new industrial markets in the IP buffer zone,and on the other hand,technology based on algorithms affects the autonomy of rights holders.Therefore,if legislative technology does not follow the emergence of new property rights models,the existing balance of intellectual property interests will be broken.The legislator should prudently develop the property rights model of"law+technology",combine the respective advantages of"liability rules"and"property rules"under the framework of Calabresi-Melamed,and reduce the transaction costs while meeting the requirements of network effi ciency.In order to reduce the transaction cost on the basis of network effi ciency,and thus promote the sustainable prosperity of the copyright market such as the secondary creation of short videos.
出处
《电子知识产权》
2022年第9期18-26,共9页
Electronics Intellectual Property
关键词
技术措施
版权过滤机制
责任规则
财产规则
市场失灵
Technical Measures
Copyright Filtering Mechanism
Liability Rules
Property Rules
Market Failure