期刊文献+

对比Viabahn覆膜支架与金属裸支架治疗股腘动脉硬化闭塞症效果:Meta分析 被引量:2

Comparison on efficacy of Viabahn covered stent and bare metal stent for treatment of femoropopliteal arteriosclerosis obliterans:Meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的采用meta分析方法对比Viabahn覆膜支架与金属裸支架(BMS)治疗股腘动脉硬化闭塞症(ASO)的效果。方法检索筛选中国生物医学文献数据库、万方医学网、中国知网、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library和PubMed数据库关于以Viabahn覆膜支架(Viabahn组)及BMS(BMS组)治疗股腘ASO的随机对照研究,检索时间为建库至2022年4月30日;依据纳入及排除标准筛选文献。采用Cochrane RevMan 5.3软件分析组间技术成功率、12个月一/二期通畅率、靶病变血管重建(TLR)率和/或截肢率。结果最终纳入9篇文献,含Viabahn组424例、BMS组469例共893例患者。Viabahn组12个月一期通畅率高于BMS组[比值比(OR)=1.90,95%CI(1.23,2.92),P=0.004],而其TLR率低于BMS组[OR=0.44,95%CI(0.26,0.76),P=0.003],组间技术成功率[风险差异(RD)=0,95%CI(-0.01,0.02),P=0.59]、12个月二期通畅率[OR=1.48,95%CI(0.96,2.29),P=0.07]及截肢率[RD=0,95%CI(-0.02,0.03),P=0.79]差异均无统计学意义。结论Viabahn覆膜支架及BMS用于治疗股腘动脉ASO可提高12个月一期通畅率、降低TLR率,二者12个月二期通畅率及截肢率相当。 Objective To compare the efficacy of Viabahn covered stent and bare metal stent(BMS)in treatment of femoropopliteal arteriosclerosis obliterans(ASO)using meta-analysis.Methods Randomized controlled studies of Viabahn covered stent(Viabahn group)and BMS(BMS group)in treatment of femoropopliteal ASO were searched in China Biology Medicine disc(CBMdisc),Wanfang Med Online,CNKI,Embase,Web of Science,Cochrane Library and PubMed from establishment to April 30,2022.Then the literature were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criterias.Cochrane RevMan 5.3 software was used to analyze the technical success rate,12-month primary/secondary patency rate,target lesion revascularization(TLR)rate and/or amputation rate between groups.Results Nine articles were enrolled,including 893 patients,424 in Viabahn group and 469 in BMS group,respectively.The 12-month primary patency rate in Viabahn group was higher than that in BMS group(odds ratio[OR]=1.90,95%CI[1.23,2.92],P=0.004),and the TLR rate in Viabahn group was lower than that in BMS group(OR=0.44,95%CI[0.26,0.76],P=0.003).No significant difference of technical success rate(risk difference[RD]=0,95%CI[-0.01,0.02],P=0.59),12-month secondary patency rate(OR=1.48,95%CI[0.96,2.29],P=0.07)nor amputation rate(RD=0,95%CI[-0.02,0.03],P=0.79)was found between groups.Conclusion Both Viabahn covered stent and BMS could increase the 12-month primary patency rate and reduce the TLR rate in treatment of femoropopliteal ASO,with matches 12-month secondary patency rates and amputation rates.
作者 郭坚东 林印胜 陈梅 张艳 李承志 GUO Jiandong;LIN Yinsheng;CHEN Mei;ZHANG Yan;LI Chengzhi(Department of Intervention and Vascular Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University,Guangzhou 510630,China)
出处 《中国介入影像与治疗学》 北大核心 2022年第10期623-628,共6页 Chinese Journal of Interventional Imaging and Therapy
关键词 股动脉 腘动脉 闭塞性动脉硬化 介入治疗 支架 荟萃分析 femoral artery popliteal artery arteriosclerosis obliterans interventional therapy stents meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献55

  • 1包俊敏,陈凯.股浅动脉支架成形术后再狭窄腔内治疗进展[J].中国血管外科杂志(电子版),2014,6(2):71-73. 被引量:3
  • 2谷涌泉,张建,汪忠镐,俞恒锡,李建新,李学锋,齐立行,郭连瑞,崔世军,罗涛,董宗俊.糖尿病性下肢缺血的外科治疗[J].中华糖尿病杂志(1006-6187),2004,12(5):328-331. 被引量:26
  • 3Fowkes FG,Rudan D,Rudan I,et al.Comparison of global estimates of prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: a systematic review and analysis[J].Lancet,2013,382(9901):1329-1340.
  • 4Alzamora MT,Forés R,Baena-Díez JM,et al.The peripheral arterial disease study (PERART/ARTPER): prevalence and risk factors in the general population[J].BMC Public Health,2010,10:38.doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-38.
  • 5Berger JS,Hochman J,Lobach I,et al.Modifiable risk factor burden and the prevalence of peripheral artery disease in different vascular territories[J].J Vasc Surg,2013,58(3):673-681.
  • 6He M,Qin X,Cui Y,et al.Prevalence of unrecognized lower extremity peripheral arterial disease and the associated factors in chinese hypertensive adults[J].Am J Cardiol,2012,110(11):1692-1698.
  • 7Saxon RR,Dake MD,Volgelzang RL,et al.Randomized,multicenter study comparing expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered endoprosthesis placement with percutaneous transluminal angio plasty in the treatment of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease[J].J Vasc Interv Radiol,2008,19(6):823-832.
  • 8Schanzer A,Conte MS.Critical limb ischemia[J].Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med,2010,12(3):214-229.
  • 9Doomernik DE,Golchehr B,Lensvelt MM,et al.The role of superficial femoral artery endoluminal bypass in long de novo lesions and in-stent restenosis[J].J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino),2012,53(4):447-457.
  • 10Geraghty PJ,Mewissen MW,Jaff MR,et al.Three-year results of the VIBRANT trial of Viabahn endoprosthesis versus bare nitinol stent implantation for complex superficial femoral artery occlusive disease [J].J Vasc Surg 2013,58(2):386-395.

共引文献335

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部