期刊文献+

唯科学主义语言学的方法论 被引量:10

The Methodology of Scientistic Linguistics
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文从四个维度对唯科学主义语言学的方法论进行反思。从本体论上看,唯科学主义语言学基于可分性假设,主张个体主义本体论和单层现实观,强调语言的客观实在性,但却忽视了言语主体对语言的建构作用。从逻辑上看,唯科学主义语言学沿袭经典逻辑,但该逻辑仅适用于言语层面的具体实体,不适用于语言层面的抽象实体。从认识论上看,唯科学主义语言学主张还原论、决定论和局部线性因果论,只能解释言语现象,不能解释语言的整体特征。从价值论上看,唯科学主义语言学难以做到知行合一、理实并重。研究表明,语言学亟需走出牛顿思维下的唯科学主义困境,积极拥抱量子思维,从学科研究范式向超学科研究范式转向。 This paper reflects on the methodology of scientistic linguistics from four dimensions.Ontologically,scientistic linguistics advocates individualistic ontology and a single level of reality based on the separability hypothesis,emphasizing the objective reality of language while ignoring the constructive role of speakers.Logically,scientistic linguistics follows classical logic,which is valid for the discussion of concrete entities at parole but invalid for the explanation of abstract entities at langue.Epistemologically,scientistic linguistics embraces reductionism,determinism and local linear causality,which can account for speech phenomena but not for the global properties at langue.Axiologically,it is difficult for scientistic linguistics to achieve the unity of theory and practice.Taken together,this research shows that linguistics needs to get out of the scientistic dilemma under Newtonian thinking,and should embrace quantum thinking,thus shifting from disciplinary to transdisciplinary research.
作者 王仁强 WANG Renqiang(Dictionary Research Center,Sichuan International Studies University,Chongqing 400031,P.R.China)
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第5期634-644,共11页 Modern Foreign Languages
关键词 唯科学主义语言学 个体主义本体论 经典逻辑 还原论 scientistic linguistics individualistic ontology classical logic reductionism
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献55

  • 1詹卫东.关于“NP+的+VP”偏正结构[J].汉语学习,1998(2):24-28. 被引量:53
  • 2袁毓林.基于隶属度的汉语词类的模糊划分[J].中国社会科学,2005(1):164-177. 被引量:25
  • 3Barlow, Michael. A Situated Theory of Agreement [M]. New York: Garland, 1992.
  • 4Chafe, Wallace. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing [M]. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
  • 5Fauconnier, Gilles. Mental Spaces." Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language [M]. Cambridge,MA and London: MIT Press/Bradford, 1985.
  • 6Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Minds Hidden Complexities [M]. New York: Basic Books, 2002.
  • 7Gensler, Orin D. Non-Syntactic Antecedents and Frame Semantics[A]. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting ofthe Berkeley Linguistics Society[Z]. 1977, 3:321-334.
  • 8Haiman, John. Dictionaries and Encyclopedias [J]. Lingua, 1980, 50: 329-357.
  • 9Hankamer, Jorge, and Ivan Sag. Deep and Surface Anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry, 1976, 7: 391-428.
  • 10Kovecses, Zoltan, and Gtinter Radden. Metonymy: Developing a Cognitive Linguistic View. Cognitive Linguistics, 1998, 9: 33-77.

共引文献116

同被引文献78

引证文献10

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部