期刊文献+

紧凑城市下营建城市空间民主性的策略研究

Research on the Strategy of Constructing Urban Spatial Democracy under Compact City
下载PDF
导出
摘要 紧凑城市发展模式虽然以多种实践途径控制了城市边界无序扩张等问题,但在发展过程中缺乏对民主性城市空间的营建的探讨。本文回顾了紧凑城市发展过程中的问题、既有评价机制的应用;通过历史、概念、案例等多元视角解析民主性与设计实践的相互关系,并由此结合紧凑城市发展问题与既有研究,分析城市空间民主性的理念;通过现实案例、城市结构、设计策略等层面,指出紧凑城市下营造城市空间民主性的意义及解决的问题;通过城市、绿地、社会、文化等层级,结合紧凑城市发展背景,提出了“一提、一推、一建、一优”营建城市空间民主性的设计策略。 Although the compact city development model controls the disordered sprawl of urban boundaries in various practical ways,it lacks discussion on the construction of democratic urban space in the development process.This paper reviews the problems in the process of compact city development and the application of the existing evaluation mechanism.This paper analyzes the relationship between democracy and design practice from multiple perspectives such as history,concept and case,and analyzes the concept of urban spatial democracy by combining the development problems of compact cities and the existing research.Through practical cases,urban structure and design strategies,this paper points out the significance of creating urban spatial democracy in compact cities and the problems to be solved.Based on the urban,green space,social and cultural levels and the development background of compact cities,this paper puts forward the design strategies of“one proposal”,“one push”,“one construction”and“one excellence”to build urban space democracy.
作者 廖雨翔 Liao Yuxiang
出处 《城市建筑》 2022年第19期105-107,共3页 Urbanism and Architecture
关键词 紧凑城市 城市空间 民主空间 compact city urban space democratic space
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献95

  • 1[1]Alexander,C.et al.A Pattern Language[M].New York:Oxford University Press,1977.
  • 2[2]Altman,I.and Werner,C.Home Environments[M].New York:Plenum,1985.
  • 3[3]Alves.T.Medium Density Housing in Melbourne:The management of sustainable and democratic local communities under global pressure for increased urban efficiencies[C].Proceedings of the 19th EAROPH World Planning and Housing Congress and National Housing Conference 2004,Melboorne:RMIT,2004.
  • 4[4]Birrell,B.,O'Connor,K,Rapson,V.and Healy,E.Melbourne 2030:planning rhetoric versus urban reality[M].Melbourne:Monash University ePress,2005.
  • 5[5]Bishop,B.and Syme,G.The Social Costs and Benefits of Urban Consolidation:A time budget/contingent valuation approach[J].Journal of Economic Psychology,1995,16:223-245.
  • 6[6]Bourdieu,P.Outline of a Theory of Practice[M].London:Cambridge University Press,1977.
  • 7[7]Bourdieu,P.Distinction[M].London:Routledge,1984.
  • 8[8]Bourdieu,P.The Field of Cultural Production[M].New York:Columbia University Press,1993.
  • 9[9]Brindle,R.and Landsell,H.Integrated Planning and Sustainable Development[M].Melbourne:ARRB Transport Research Ltd,1999.
  • 10[10]Brindley,A.The Role of Backyards in Suburban Life:a case study-Millswood,Adelaide[J].South Australian Geographical Review,1999,98:61-77.

共引文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部