期刊文献+

托班区域材料投放的适宜性研究——基于78个托班的量表观察 被引量:1

Suitability Study on Material Delivery in Regional Activities in Nurseries
下载PDF
导出
摘要 区域活动是满足婴幼儿个性化发展的最佳途径,而区域材料投放的适宜性直接影响区域活动开展的质量。笔者运用量表对区域材料投放的适宜性进行观察评估,结果发现,区域材料投放质量较低。线性回归分析结果表明,教师学历、师幼比等变量对区域材料投放质量有显著影响。研究建议,国家要出台相关政策,严格把控教师学历,监控师幼比的达标程度;托班教师要增强0-3岁婴幼儿早期教育理论知识的学习,托育机构要定期开展“区域材料投放”的专题研讨活动,提高教师区域材料选择与投放的能力。 Regional activities are the best way to meet the personalized development of infants and young children, and the suitability of regional material delivery directly affects the quality of regional activities. The author used the scale to observe and evaluate the suitability of regional material delivery, and found that the quality of regional material delivery was low. The results of linear regression analysis showed that the variables such as teachers’ academic qualifications and teacher-to-child ratio have a significant impact on the quality of regional material delivery. The study suggested that 1) the state should issue relevant policies to strictly control teachers’ academic qualifications and monitor the standard level of teacher-to-child ratio;2) nursery teachers should enhance the learning of the theoretical knowledge of early education at the age of 0-3, and nursery institutions should regularly carry out special seminars on “regional material delivery”to improve teachers’ ability to select and deliver regional materials.
作者 丁骞 张晓梅 宋占美 DING Qian;ZHANG Xiao-mei;SONG Zhan-mei(College of Preschool Education,Shandong Yingcai University,Jinan 250104,China;College of Preschool Education,Qilu Normal University,Jinan 250200,China;College of International Education,Wenzhou University,Wenzhou 325035,China)
出处 《陕西学前师范学院学报》 2022年第10期25-31,40,共8页 Journal of Shaanxi Xueqian Normal University
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究项目青年课题(20YJC880010) 山东英才学院高层次科研课题培育项目(20YCKYPY06)。
关键词 0-3岁托班 区域材料 材料投放 0-3-year-old nursery institution regional materials material delivery
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献83

  • 1陈培瑞.我国教育发展方式亟待转变[J].求是,1996(7):33-36. 被引量:4
  • 2范国睿,李树峰.内涵发展:教育均衡发展的新趋向[J].上海教育科研,2007(7):14-17. 被引量:36
  • 3.《幼儿园等级评定标准》广东(2001)、深圳(1998)、 江苏(1996)、南京(2002)、上海(1995)[M].,..
  • 4约翰·杜威.学校与社会·明日之学校[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1994..
  • 5Scarr,S. ,Eisenberg,M. ,& Deater-Deckard,K. ( 1994 ).Measurement of quality in child care centers.Early Childhood Research Quaterly,9,131-151.
  • 6Schweinhart,L.& Weikart,D. ( 1992 ).Significant benefits:The High/Scope Perry Preschool Study through age 27.Yapsilanti,MI:High/Scope Educational Research Foundation.
  • 7Ramey,C.T.,Campbell,M.,& Blair,C. (1998).Enhancing the life course for high risk children:Results from the Abecedarian project.In J.Came (Ed.),Social Programs that Really Work.NY:Sage Publishing, 163-183.
  • 8NICHD Early Child Care Research Network (in Press ).Characteristics and quality of child care for toddlers and preschoolers.Applied Developmental Sciences.
  • 9Frede,E.C. ( 1995 ).The role of program quality in producing early childhood program benefits.The Future of Children ,5 ( 3 ), 115-131.
  • 10Palmerus ( 1996 ) .Child caregivers ratios in day care center groups:Impact on verbal interactions Early Childhood development and Care, 118,45-47.

共引文献189

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部