期刊文献+

隐性知识视角的研究生导师制优化策略 被引量:2

Optimization strategies of graduate tutorial system from the perspective of tacit knowledge
下载PDF
导出
摘要 导师制是研究生教育的基本制度,隐性知识是其核心价值所在。导师通过对研究生道德情操的熏陶、科研思维的传承、创新精神的培养,会将隐性知识传授学生。但就研究生导师制实施的现状而言,导师之“导”过程不足、内容异化、方向模糊,直接影响了导师制“隐性知识”核心价值的发挥。导师制的改进应遵循道器不离的基本策略,推进寓教于研、寓研于教,发展学术共同体。 The tutorial system,whose core value is tacit knowledge,forms the basic system of postgraduate education.The tutor will impart the postgraduate students with tacit knowledge in such ways as the edification of moral sentiment,the inheritance of scientific research spirit and the cultivation of creative thinking.However,as far as the status quo of the tutorial system of postgraduate education is concerned,the inadequacy of the“guidance”process,the content alienation and the vague direction of the tutorial system directly weaken the core value of the tacit knowledge of the tutorial system.The tutorial system can't be optimized without research,which is the core of postgraduate education.Learning through doing research,doing research through teaching,and developing academic communities are effective optimization strategies of the tutorial system.
作者 汤智 周怡 TANG Zhi;ZHOU Yi(Academic Affair Office,Zhejiang University of Technology,Hangzhou 310014,China)
出处 《浙江工业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2022年第3期333-337,共5页 Journal of Zhejiang University of Technology:Social Sciences
基金 浙江省高校重大人文社科攻关计划项目(2021GH026) 大学生学业质量治理的制度创新研究(2021GH026) 浙江工业大学研究生教改项目(2021206)。
关键词 隐性知识 研究生导师制 优化策略 tacit knowledge tutorial system optimization strategies
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1林伟连,吴克象.研究生教育中师生关系建设要突出“导学关系”[J].学位与研究生教育,2003(5):26-28. 被引量:86
  • 2吴雪萍,刘辉.澳大利亚高等教育教学质量保障策略探究[J].比较教育研究,2004,25(9):71-75. 被引量:23
  • 3Carolin Kreber, Teaching Excellence,Teaching Expertise,and the Scholarship of Teaching [J], Innovative Higher Education, 2002,27 (1).
  • 4Mary Taylor Huber. Disciplines and the Development ofa Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the UnitedStates of America [EB/OL]. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/embedded_object.asp?id=17612&filename=Discuss001.
  • 5Glassick,C, E,,Huber,M, T,,Maeroff, G, I,, Scholarship Assessed:Evaluation of the Professoriate[M]. San Francisco :Jossey-Bass, 1997.6-7,36,.
  • 6R. Eugene Rice. Rethinking Scholarship and New Practice:A Central AAHE Priority[ EB/OL ]. http://www.aahe.org/specialreports/part4.htm, 2005-05-26.
  • 7E.L.波伊尔.学术水平反思—教授工作的重点领域[A]..当代外国教育改革著名文献(美国卷·第三册)[C].北京:人民教育出版社,2004.9..
  • 8Lee Shulman, From Minsk To Pinsk:Why A Scholarship of Teaching And Learning? [J], Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning(JoSoTL),2000,1(1) :48-53.
  • 9Randy Bass. The Scholarship of Teaching:What's the Problem? [EB/OL]. http://www.doiiit.gmu.edu/Arclfives/feb98/rbass.htm, 2005-05-24.
  • 10Richard M, Felder, The Scholarship of Teaching [J].Chem. Engr, Education,2000,34(2) : 144.

共引文献475

同被引文献33

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部