期刊文献+

媒介构造与范式生产:“远读”方法的演变及其前景 被引量:4

Media Formation and Paradigm Production: Evolution of the Method of “Distant Reading” and Its Prospects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 弗朗科·莫莱蒂所提出的“远读”对西方学界产生了极大的影响。学者多将之归结为数字人文研究的一部分,而鲜有人指出远读单独作为研究方法的重要意义。本文提出以“阅读媒介”的概念来理解远读方法的演变过程。阅读媒介是一种信息反馈装置,具有改变读者文本认知的功能。远读方法的演变实则是不同的阅读媒介对研究者认知能力的改变:他人研究将文本转变为专家意见,量化分析将文本转变为数据,建构模型则在量化的基础上将数据转变为文学模型。一系列认知变化带来了研究方法的变化,远读方法在演变过程中融合了多学科的思维方式,具备了成为新文科研究范式的潜力。 Franco Moretti’s “distant reading” has had a significant impact on Western scholarship. While scholars mainly categorize it as part of the research in digital humanities, few have noted the importance of distant reading as a research method in itself. This article proposes the concept of “reading media” as an approach to understanding the evolution of distant reading as a method. “Reading media” is a kind of information feedback apparatus capable of changing readers’ perception of a text. The evolution of the distant reading method indicates that different reading media have transformed the researchers’ cognitive ability of texts;that is, other people’s research transforms the texts into expert opinions, quantitative analysis transforms texts into data, and modeling transforms data into literary models based on quantification. A series of cognitive changes have brought about changes in research methods. The distant reading approach in particular has evolved to integrate multidisciplinary thinking and, therefore, has the potential to become a new paradigm for liberal arts research.
作者 郑楠 Zheng Nan(College of Liberal Arts,Jinan University,Guangzhou 510632,Guangdong Province,China)
机构地区 暨南大学文学院
出处 《文艺理论研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第4期104-112,共9页 Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art
关键词 远读 阅读媒介 量化分析 建模 新文科 distant reading reading media quantitative analysis modeling new liberal arts
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献80

  • 1Marx Weber, "Objectivity in Social Science and Social Policy", 1904, in The Methodology of the Social Sciences, New York, 1949, p. 68.
  • 2Roberto Schwarz, "The Importing of the Novel to Brazil and Its Contradictions in the Work of Roberto Alencar", 1977, in Misplaced Ideas, London, 1992, p. 50.
  • 3Itamar Even-Zohar, "Laws of Literary Interference" in Poetics Today, 1990, pp. 54, 62.
  • 4Montserrat Iglesias Santos, "El sistema literario: teoria empfrica y teorta de los polisistemas", in Dario Villanueva ( ed. ), Avances en teoria de la literatura, Santiago de Compostela 1994, p. 339.
  • 5Marc Bloch, "Pour une histoire comparee des societes europeennes", Revue de synthise historique, 1928.
  • 6"Objecfivity in Social Science and Social Policy", p. 106.
  • 7Fredric Jameson, "In the Mirror of Alternate Modernities", in Karatani Kojin, Origins of Modern Japanese Literature, Durham-London 1993, p. xiii.
  • 8《1800-1900欧洲小说地图》.
  • 9The Atlas of the European Novel 1800 -1900 , Verso: London, 1998.
  • 10大卫·加斯珀莱迪(David Gasperetti).《俄国小说的兴起》( The Rise of the Russian Novel), De Kalb, 1998, p. 5.

共引文献229

同被引文献94

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部