摘要
【目的】探讨猕猴桃营养品质综合评价指标的筛选和分级综合评价体系的建立,为猕猴桃营养品质综合评价提供技术支撑。【方法】以我国猕猴桃3大主产区6个品种155份猕猴桃果实样品为材料,测定果实可溶性固形物、可溶性总糖、总酸、维生素C、蔗糖、葡萄糖、果糖、柠檬酸、奎宁酸、苹果酸、总酚、叶绿素和类胡萝卜素含量等13个营养品质指标,利用SPSS软件通过相关性分析和主成分分析筛选确定猕猴桃营养品质评价代表性指标,运用层次分析法计算并确定代表性指标权重,结合概率分级法和合理全距等分法建立指标评分标准和综合评价体系。【结果】猕猴桃营养品质指标变异幅度整体较大,变异系数为14.68%~112.94%,其中蔗糖含量的变异系数最大,达112.94%;总酸和柠檬酸含量变异系数相对较小,分别为14.68%和15.85%。通过相关性分析和层次分析,从13项指标中筛选出4项猕猴桃营养品质综合评价代表性指标,分别为可溶性固形物(甜味指标)、总酸(酸味指标)、维生素C(营养功能指标)、类胡萝卜素含量(色泽功能指标),4项指标均符合正态分布,其权重系数分别为56%、20%、20%、8%,每项指标通过概率分级划分为极低、低、中、高、和极高5个等级,采用全距等分法建立4项代表性指标综合评分标准,将155份猕猴桃样品划分为3个等级,即特级、一级和二级。【结论】猕猴桃营养品质综合评价代表指标为可溶性固形物、总酸、维生素C和类胡萝卜素含量,建立的4项营养品质综合评分标准可用于猕猴桃营养品质的科学评价与分级。
【Objective】The evaluation on nutritional trait is an important procedure for kiwifruit breeding and comprehensive utilization. In order to provide technical support for comprehensive evaluation of kiwifruit nutritional traits, the nutritional quality indexes of kiwifruit were determined and the establishment of classification system was discussed in this study.【Methods】155 kiwifruit fruit samples from three major kiwifruit producing areas(Shanxi province, Sichuan province and Henan province)were collected in September, 2020. The cultivars of kiwifruit samples were Cuixiang, Hayward, Hongyang, Jintao, Jinyan and Xuxiang. Thirteen nutritional quality indexes including total soluble solids, total sugar, total acid, vitamin C, sucrose, glucose, fructose, citric acid, quinic acid, malic acid, total phenols, chlorophylls and carotenoids were determined after ripening and softening. A refractometer was used to determine the content of total soluble solids according to NY/T 2637—2014. Phenanthroline titration was used to determine total soluble sugar content. 2, 6-dichloroindophenol titration was used to determine vitamin C content according to GB 5009.86-2016. The method of NaOH neutralization was used for determination of total acid content according to GB/T 12456—2008. The content of organic acids was determined by Metrohm 861 IC according to NY/T 2796—2015. Sucrose, glucose and fructose contents were determined by Waters 2695-2489-2475 HPLC according to GB 5009.8-2016. Folin-ciocalteu colorimetry determination of total phenol was conducted according to NY/T 1600—2008. The total contents of chlorophylls and carotenoids were determined by colorimetry. The SPSS software was used to extract the representative indexes of kiwifruit nutritional quality evaluation by correlation and principal component analysis. The weight of representative indexes was by analytic hierarchy process(AHP). The index scoring standard and comprehensive evaluation system were determined by the probability classification analysis and the reasonable full-distance equal analysis.【Results】The variation range of kiwifruit nutritional quality indexes varied greatly, with the variation coefficient ranging from14.68% to 112.94%. The sucrose value had the largest variation coefficient of 112.94%. However, the total acid and citric acid had a relatively lower variation coefficient, which was 14.68% and 15.85%, respectively. There was a significant correlation among the nutritional quality indexes. The total soluble solids had a very significant positive correlation to total sugar, sucrose, glucose and fructose contents(p<0.01). There was a very significant positive correlation between total acid and citric acid content(p<0.01). Vitamin C showed a very significant positive correlation to total sugar, glucose and total phenol content(p<0.01). Four principal factors were extracted from the 13 indexes, which contributed to38.59%, 13.77%, 12.71% and 11.31% of variation, respectively, with a cumulative percentage of76.39%. The 1st principal component represented indexes including total soluble solids, total sugar, glucose, fructose and vitamin C, which reflected the sweet taste and functional characteristics of kiwifruit.And the 2nd principal component included total acid, citric acid and total phenol, which reflected sour taste and functional characteristics of kiwifruit. The third principal component included chlorophyll,which reflected the color characteristics of kiwifruit. The fourth principal component was carotenoids,which reflected the color and functional characteristics of kiwifruit. Four representative indexes(total soluble solids, total acid, vitamin C and carotenoids) were screened as evaluation indexes of kiwifruit nutritional quality by correlation analysis and AHP, which represented sweet index, sour index, nutritional function index and color function index, respectively. The total soluble solids had the greatest impact on the nutritional quality of kiwifruit, followed by total acid and vitamin C, and carotenoids had the least impact. The total soluble solids, vitamin C and carotenoid indexes were positive, however, total acid was a negative index. The four indexes were in line with normal distribution, and their weight coefficients were 56%, 20%, 20%, and 8%, respectively. These four indexes could be divided into 5grades(lower, low, medium, high, and higher) and the scoring standards of them were also established.The scores of the four indexes from lower to higher were 10.4-52.0, 4.0-20.0, 4.0-20.0 and 1.6-8.0, respectively. The total score of each sample was the sum of the four index scores, and the full scores was100. The 155 kiwifruit samples were divided into 3 grades, including super grade(>70 scores), first grade(45-70 scores)and second grade(<45 scores). There were 37 kiwifruit samples classified as second grade, 66 kiwifruit samples classified as first grade and 52 kiwifruit samples in super grade.【Conclusion】The representative indexes of comprehensive evaluation of kiwifruit nutritional quality were total soluble solids, total acid, vitamin C and carotenoids. The established four comprehensive nutritional quality scoring standards could be used for evaluation and classification of kiwifruit nutritional quality.
作者
郭琳琳
庞荣丽
王瑞萍
乔成奎
田发军
王彩霞
李君
庞涛
成昕
谢汉忠
GUO Linlin;PANG Rongli;WANG Ruiping;QIAO Chengkui;TIAN Fajun;WANG Caixia;LI Jun;PANG Tao;CHENG Xin;XIE Hanzhong(Zhengzhou Fruit Research Institute,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Henan,China,Henan Key Laboratory of Fruit and Cucurbit Biology,Zhengzhou 450009,Henan,China;The Center for Agri-Food Quality&Safety,MARA,Beijing 100081,China)
出处
《果树学报》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2022年第10期1864-1872,共9页
Journal of Fruit Science
基金
中国农业科学院科技创新工程专项经费项目(CAAS-ASTIP-2022-ZFRI-09)
中国农业科学院科技创新工程重大科研任务(CAAS-XTCX20190025-4)
河南省科技攻关项目(212102110403)。
关键词
猕猴桃
营养品质
主成分分析
层次分析
综合评价
Kiwifruit
Nutritional quality
Principal component analysis
AHP
Comprehensive evaluation