期刊文献+

新时代高校科技人才评价的趋向与优化路径 被引量:4

The Trend and Optimization of Evaluation of Scientific and Technological Talents in Universities in the New Era
下载PDF
导出
摘要 高校科技人才评价是衡量科技人才工作成果、了解并促进科技人才专业发展水平的重要途径。文章分析了新时代高校科技人才岗位的新特点,从评价基础、评价目的、评价内容、评价过程、评价方式等方面深入剖析新时代高校科技人才评价的趋向。在对新时代高校科技人才评价新趋向反思的基础上,文章提出进一步完善新时代高校科技人才评价体系的具体路径,包括坚持以人为本,实施发展性评价;坚持岗位优先,构建网格化人才分类体系;坚持“破”“立”结合,强化以质量和贡献为导向的评价体系;坚持完善治理体系,为科技人才评价提供制度保障等。 The evaluation of scientific and technological talents in universities is an important way to measure the achievements of scientific and technological talents,to understand and promote the professional development level of scientific and technological talents.The article analyzes the new characteristics of scientific and technological talents positions in universities in the new era,and deeply analyzes the trend faced by the evaluation of scientific and technological talents in universities in the new era from the aspects of evaluation basis,evaluation purpose,evaluation content,evaluation process,and evaluation method.On the basis of the reflection on the new trend of the evaluation of science and technology talents in universities in the new era,the article proposes a specific path to further improve the evaluation system of scientific and technological talents in universities in the new era,including adhering to put people first and implementing developmental evaluation;adhering to the priority of positions and building a gridbased talent classification system;adhering to the combination of“breaking”and“standing”,and strengthening the evaluation system oriented by quality and contribution;adhere to improve the management system,and provide system guarantee for the evaluation of scientific and technological talents,etc.
作者 梁淑红 Liang Shuhong(Institute for Higher Education,North China Electric Power University,Beijing,102206)
出处 《科技智囊》 2022年第10期14-21,共8页 Think Tank of Science & Technology
基金 北京市社会科学基金项目“‘放管服’背景下首都高校二级学院的权力配置与监管研究”(项目编号:19JYB007)研究成果。
关键词 高校科技人才 发展性评价 “破五唯” 质量 贡献 Scientific and technological talents in universities Developmental evaluation “Breaking only papers,only hats,only professional titles,only academic qualifications,only awards” Quality Contribution
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献38

共引文献189

同被引文献61

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部